Historiografi Tionghoa adalah kajian terhadap teknik dan sumber yang dipakai sejarawan untuk menilik sejarah Tiongkok.
Pencatatan sejarah Tiongkok dapat ditilik kembali ke zaman Dinasti Shang (sekitar 1600-1046 SM). Tulisan-tulisan tersebut masih bertahan hingga zaman modern dalam bentuk inskripsi upacara, ramalan, dan pencatatan nama keluarga yang diukir atau dilukis di tempurung kura-kura atau tulang..[1][2]
Sementara itu, teks sejarah tertua di Tiongkok yang telah ditemukan disusun dalam Shujing (書經).
Catatan kaki
↑William G. Boltz, Early Chinese Writing, World Archaeology, Vol. 17, No. 3, Early Writing Systems. (Feb., 1986), hlm. 420–436 (436).
↑David N. Keightley, "Art, Ancestors, and the Origins of Writing in China", Representations, No. 56, Special Issue: The New Erudition. (Autumn, 1996), hlm.68–95 (68).
Bacaan lanjut
W. G. Beasley and Edwin G. Pulleyblank. Historians of China and Japan. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1962. Essays on the historiographical traditions in pre-modern times.
Paul Cohen, "Reflections on a Watershed Date: The 1949 Divide in Chinese History," in Jeffrey Wasserstrom, ed., Twentieth-Century China: New Approaches (London; New York: Routledge, 2003), 29–36.
Paul A. Cohen, Rethinking China's History: Alternative Perspectives on the Chinese Past (New York London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003). Reprints of Cohen's influential reviews and essays.
Johanna Waley-Cohen, "The New Qing History," Radical History Review 88.1 (2004): 193–206.
Pamela Kyle Crossley, "The Historiography of Modern China," in Michael Bentley, ed., Companion to Historiography (Taylor & Francis, 1997), 641-658.
Arif Dirlik. Revolution and History: The Origins of Marxist Historiography in China, 1919–1937. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978. ISBN0-520-03541-0.
Prasenjit Duara. Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Albert Feuerwerker. History in Communist China. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1968. Essays on the post-1949 treatment of particular aspects of Chinese history.
Judith Farquhar James Hevia, "Culture and Postwar American Historiography of China," positions 1.2 (1993): 486–525. Critique of orthodox historiography.
Joshua A. Fogel. Politics and Sinology: The Case of Naito Konan (1866–1934). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Harvard East Asian Monographs, 1984. ISBN0-674-68790-6. Naito Konan developed the influential thesis that China developed an early modern society from the 8th to the 12th century.
David S.G. Goodman (September 2006). "Mao and the Da Vinci Code: Conspiracy, Narrative, and History". The Pacific Review. 19 (3): 359–384. doi:10.1080/09512740600875135. Critiques the assumptions and methodology Chang Jung and John Halliday's Mao: The Unknown Story.
Norman Kutcher (Winter 1993). "'The Benign Bachelor': Kenneth Scott Latourette between China and the United States". Journal of American-East Asian Relations. 2 (4): 399–424. doi:10.1163/187656193X00130. The life and historiographical place of Kenneth Scott Latourette.
William Rowe, "Approaches to Modern Chinese Social History," in Olivier Zunz, ed., Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History (University of North Carolina Press 1985), pp.236–296.
Gilbert Rozman. Soviet Studies of Premodern China: Assessments of Recent Scholarship. Ann Arbor: Center For Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, 1984. ISBN0-89264-052-9.
David L. Shambaugh, American Studies of Contemporary China (Washington, Armonk, NY: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; M.E. Sharpe, 1993)
Laurence A. Schneider, Ku Chieh-Kang and China's New History: Nationalism and the Quest for Alternative Traditions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971. ISBN0-520-01804-4. The first generation of Chinese historians to use Western concepts to write the history of China.
Stefan Tanaka. Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. ISBN0-520-07731-8.
Harriet Zurndorfer, "A Guide to the 'New' Chinese History: Recent Publications Concerning Chinese Social and Economic Development before 1800," International Review of Social History 33: 148–201.