Lulism (Brazilian Portuguese: Lulismo) is a political ideology describing the 2006 consolidation of segments of Brazilian society previously hostile to social movements and the Workers' Party behind political forces led by PresidentLuiz Inácio Lula da Silva,[34] appealed by a controlled reformism and limited structural change focused on the poorest sections of society.[35] The lower classes, who had distanced themselves from Lula, accepted his candidacy after his first term as President as the middle class turned from him. The rhetoric and praxis which united the maintenance of stability and state distributism are the origins of Lulism.[34] While advocating socialism, Lulism aims for a 'social liberal' approach that gradually resolves the gap between the rich and the poor in a market-oriented way.[4][36]
Brazilian manufacturers, banks and retailers benefited from the consumption-led and credit-fueled government economic model.[37] According to André Singer, who coined the term: "The convergence of interests of the private industry sector on one side, and of the organized labor force on the other, led to the stability that allowed this political system to take the form of a sort of consensus".[38] This equilibrium allowed the government to gradually make significant changes in policy. In the Lulism movement, non-confrontation is a sine qua non for development. It is part of the Latin American leftist wave known as Socialism of the 21st century.[39]
Evolution
The word Lulism was coined by André Singer, a political scientist and Lula's press secretary from 2003 to 2005 and spokesperson during his presidency from 2002 to 2007.[35][40][41][42] Originating in the 2002 presidential campaign, Lulism departed from the left-wing politics of the Workers' Party until late 2001[34] and abandoned the concepts of organization and mobilization. Since Lulism is a model of enforced change within order, mobilization is unnecessary and conflict is eliminated.[41]
A 2009 article written for the Instituto Millenium said that "liberals are cornered" after "more than six years of Lulism". Patrícia Carlos de Andrade adopted that view: "According to her, the term 'liberal' is mistranslated in Brazil as 'rightist' or 'supportive of military dictatorships'. In the war for public opinion, the so-called left always got the better, Singer says".[43] Lula da Silva has also been described in media and books as a "liberal" in the sense of social rather than classical.[5][44][45]
Under the auspices of conciliation,[48] Lulism represents an "appeasement of social conflicts, of which the bourgeoisie has always [been] too afraid, especially in a country of great inequality as is the case of Brazil" because it envisions a "reduction-agenda poverty and inequality, but under the aegis of a weak reformism".[47] This social change model is explained as a "conservative variant of modernization" in which the state has a "prominent role in leveraging the poorest", ensuring that Brazilian social structural problems will not be touched (in other words, without conflicting with the financial interests of the conservative elite).[48] Lulism "concocted new ideological, under-union banners that seemed to combine" continuity of the Lula and Cardoso governments in macroeconomic policy based on three pillars, namely inflation control, a floating exchange rate and a budgetary surplus.[34]
Another feature distinguishing Lulism as a political movement is its nonpartisan character. It overlaps the political parties, including the Workers' Party founded by Lula.[49]
↑Samuels, D. (2004). From Socialism to Social Democracy: Party Organization and the Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 37(9), 999–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004268856
↑Francisco Luiz Corsi; José Marangoni Camargo; Agnaldo dos Santos; Rosângela de Lima Vieira, eds. (2014). Economia e Sociedade: o Brasil e a América Latina na conjuntura de crise do capitalismo global. Editora Oficina Universitária.
↑John Ashley Soames Grenville, ed. (2010). A History of the World from the 20th to the 21st Century. Psychology Press. p.702. ISBN9780415289559. Lula da Silva set out to show that contemporary 'liberal socialism' can work with the market and capitalism for the benefit of all the people, while promoting public services.
↑Peter Wagner, ed. (March 9, 2015). African, American and European Trajectories of Modernity: Past Oppression, Future Justice?. Edinburgh University Press. p.284. ISBN9781474400411. Other experiences that can be mentioned here are centre-left governments such as Lula da Silva's in Brazil, Tabaré Vázquez's and Pepe Mujica's in Uruguay, and Néstor Kirchner's and Cristina Fernández Kirchner's in Argentina.
↑Fouad Sabry, ed. (August 2024). Politicisation: Power Plays, The Expanding Reach of Politics. One Billion Knowledgeable. As a pragmatic ideology that is on the center-left, lulism is referred to as "socialist neoliberalism" because of its pragmatic philosophy
12"Brazil: Is 'Lulism' over?". Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal. 23 June 2013. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
↑Richard Sandbrook, ed. (2014). Reinventing the Left in the Global South: The Politics of the Possible. Cambridge University Press. p.155. ... President Luiz Inácio (Lula) de Silva during his first term (2003–6) followed social-liberal policies ...
12Becker, Fernanda; David, Anthony (3 January 2013). "Os impasses do "lulismo"" (in Portuguese). Brasil de Fato. Archived from the original on 27 September 2013. Retrieved 8 October 2018.