In mathematics, the trigonometric moment problem is formulated as follows: given a sequence ${\displaystyle \{c_{k}\}_{k\in \mathbb {N} _{0}}}$, does there exist a distribution function ${\displaystyle \sigma }$ on the interval ${\displaystyle [0,2\pi ]}$ such that:^[1][2] $${\displaystyle c_{k}={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{0}^{2\pi }e^{-ik\theta }\,d\sigma (\theta ),}$$ with ${\displaystyle c_{-k}={\overline {c}}_{k}}$ for ${\displaystyle k\geq 1}$. An affirmative answer to the problem means that ${\displaystyle \{c_{k}\}_{k\in \mathbb {N} _{0}}}$ are the Fourier-Stieltjes coefficients for some (consequently positive) unique Radon measure ${\displaystyle \mu }$ on ${\displaystyle [0,2\pi ]}$ as distribution function.^[3][4][5][6]

In case the sequence is finite, i.e., ${\displaystyle \{c_{k}\}_{k=0}^{n<\infty }}$, it is referred to as the truncated trigonometric moment problem.^[7]

Characterization

The trigonometric moment problem is solvable, that is, ${\displaystyle \{c_{k}\}_{k=0}^{n}}$ is a sequence of Fourier coefficients, if and only if the (n + 1) × (n + 1) Hermitian Toeplitz matrix $${\displaystyle T=\left({\begin{matrix}c_{0}&c_{1}&\cdots &c_{n}\\c_{-1}&c_{0}&\cdots &c_{n-1}\\\vdots &\vdots &\ddots &\vdots \\c_{-n}&c_{-n+1}&\cdots &c_{0}\\\end{matrix}}\right)}$$ with ${\displaystyle c_{-k}={\overline {c_{k}}}}$ for ${\displaystyle k\geq 1}$, is positive semi-definite.^[6]

The "only if" part of the claims can be verified by a direct calculation. We sketch an argument for the converse. The positive semidefinite matrix ${\displaystyle T}$ defines a sesquilinear product on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n+1}}$, resulting in a Hilbert space $${\displaystyle ({\mathcal {H}},\langle \;,\;\rangle )}$$ of dimensional at most n + 1. The Toeplitz structure of ${\displaystyle T}$ means that a "truncated" shift is a partial isometry on ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}}$. More specifically, let ${\displaystyle \{e_{0},\dotsc ,e_{n}\}}$ be the standard basis of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n+1}}$. Let ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}}$ and ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F}}}$ be subspaces generated by the equivalence classes ${\displaystyle \{[e_{0}],\dotsc ,[e_{n-1}]\}}$ respectively ${\displaystyle \{[e_{1}],\dotsc ,[e_{n}]\}}$. Define an operator $${\displaystyle V:{\mathcal {E}}\rightarrow {\mathcal {F}}}$$ by $${\displaystyle V[e_{k}]=[e_{k+1}]\quad {\mbox{for}}\quad k=0\ldots n-1.}$$ Since $${\displaystyle \langle V[e_{j}],V[e_{k}]\rangle =\langle [e_{j+1}],[e_{k+1}]\rangle =T_{j+1,k+1}=T_{j,k}=\langle [e_{j}],[e_{k}]\rangle ,}$$ ${\displaystyle V}$ can be extended to a partial isometry acting on all of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}}$. Take a minimal unitary extension ${\displaystyle U}$ of ${\displaystyle V}$, on a possibly larger space (this always exists). According to the spectral theorem,^[8][9] there exists a Borel measure ${\displaystyle m}$ on the unit circle ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} }$ such that for all integer k $${\displaystyle \langle (U^{*})^{k}[e_{n+1}],[e_{n+1}]\rangle =\int _{\mathbb {T} }z^{k}dm.}$$ For ${\displaystyle k=0,\dotsc ,n}$, the left hand side is $${\displaystyle \langle (U^{*})^{k}[e_{n+1}],[e_{n+1}]\rangle =\langle (V^{*})^{k}[e_{n+1}],[e_{n+1}]\rangle =\langle [e_{n+1-k}],[e_{n+1}]\rangle =T_{n+1,n+1-k}=c_{-k}={\overline {c_{k}}}.}$$ As such, there is a ${\displaystyle j}$-atomic measure ${\displaystyle m}$ on ${\displaystyle \mathbb {T} }$, with ${\displaystyle j\leq 2n+1<\infty }$ (i.e. the set is finite), such that^[10] $${\displaystyle c_{k}=\int _{\mathbb {T} }z^{-k}dm=\int _{\mathbb {T} }{\bar {z}}^{k}dm,}$$ which is equivalent to $${\displaystyle c_{k}={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{0}^{2\pi }e^{-ik\theta }d\mu (\theta ).}$$

for some suitable measure ${\displaystyle \mu }$.

See also

• Bochner's theorem
• Hamburger moment problem
• Moment problem
• Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle
• Spectral measure
• Schur class
• Szegő limit theorems
• Wiener's lemma

Notes

References

• Akhiezer, N. I. (1965). The Classical Moment Problem and Some Related Questions in Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. doi:10.1137/1.9781611976397. ISBN 978-1-61197-638-0.
• Akhiezer, N.I.; Kreĭn, M.G. (1962). Some Questions in the Theory of Moments. Translations of mathematical monographs. American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-1552-6. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
• Curto, Raúl E.; Fialkow, Lawrence A. (1991). "Recursiveness, positivity, and truncated moment problems" (PDF). Houston Journal of Mathematics. 17 (4): 603–635. Retrieved 2025-09-10.
• Edwards, R. E. (1982). Fourier Series. Vol. 85. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8156-3. ISBN 978-1-4613-8158-7.
• Geronimus, J. (1946). "On the Trigonometric Moment Problem". Annals of Mathematics. 47 (4): 742–761. doi:10.2307/1969232. ISSN 0003-486X. JSTOR 1969232.
• Iokhvidov, Iosif Semenovich (1982). Hankel and Toeplitz Matrices and Forms. Boston: Birkhäuser. ISBN 978-3-7643-3090-3.
• Katznelson, Yitzhak (2004). An Introduction to Harmonic Analysis. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165372. ISBN 978-0-521-83829-0.
• Schmüdgen, Konrad (2017). The Moment Problem. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 277. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64546-9. ISBN 978-3-319-64545-2. ISSN 0072-5285.
• Simon, Barry (2005). Orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. Part 1. Classical theory. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. Vol. 54. Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-3446-6. MR 2105088.
• Zygmund, A. (2002). Trigonometric Series (third ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-89053-5.