In mathematics, a genus g surface (also known as a g-torus or g-holed torus) is a surface formed by the connected sum of g distinct tori: the interior of a disk is removed from each of g distinct tori and the boundaries of the g many disks are identified (glued together), forming a g-torus. The genus of such a surface is g.
The genus of a connected orientable surface is an integer representing the maximum number of cuttings along non-intersecting closed simple curves without rendering the resultant manifold disconnected.[1] It is equal to the number of handles on it. Alternatively, it can be defined in terms of the Euler characteristicχ, via the relationship χ=2−2g for closed surfaces, where g is the genus.
The genus (sometimes called the demigenus or Euler genus) of a connected non-orientable closed surface is a positive integer representing the number of cross-caps attached to a sphere. Alternatively, it can be defined for a closed surface in terms of the Euler characteristic χ, via the relationship χ = 2 − g, where g is the non-orientable genus.
Genus 0
An orientable surface of genus zero is the sphereS2. Another surface of genus zero is the disc.
Representations of genus 0 surfaces
A sphere
A closed disc (with boundary)
By the Heawood conjecture, it can be coloured with up to 4 mutually adjacent regions
Genus 1
A genus one orientable surface is the ordinary torus. A non-orientable surface of genus one is the projective plane.[2]
The term triple torus is also occasionally used to denote a genus 3 surface.[7][5]
The Klein quartic is a compact Riemann surface of genus3 with the highest possible order automorphism group for compact Riemann surfaces of genus 3. It has 168 orientation-preserving automorphisms, and 336 automorphisms altogether.
12Mayorga, Luis S.; Masone, Diego (2024). "The Secret Ballet Inside Multivesicular Bodies". ACS Nano. 18 (24): 15651–15660. doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c01590. PMID38830824.
↑Bolza, Oskar (1887), "On Binary Sextics with Linear Transformations into Themselves", American Journal of Mathematics, 10 (1): 47–70, doi:10.2307/2369402, JSTOR2369402