 |
Enclosing circle radius
 |
Density
 |
Optimality |
Layout(s) of the
circles |
| 1 |
1 |
1.0000... |
Trivially optimal. |
 |
| 2 |
2 |
0.5000... |
Trivially optimal. |
 |
| 3 |
2.155...
 |
0.6461... |
Trivially optimal. |
 |
| 4 |
2.414...  |
0.6864... |
Trivially optimal. |
 |
| 5 |
2.701...  |
0.6854... |
Proved optimal by Graham (1968)[2] |
 |
| 6 |
3 |
0.6666... |
Proved optimal by Graham (1968)[2] |
 |
| 7 |
3 |
0.7777... |
Trivially optimal. |
 |
| 8 |
3.304...  |
0.7328... |
Proved optimal by Pirl (1969)[3] |
 |
| 9 |
3.613...  |
0.6895... |
Proved optimal by Pirl (1969)[3] |
 |
| 10 |
3.813... |
0.6878... |
Proved optimal by Pirl (1969)[3] |
 |
| 11 |
3.923...  |
0.7148... |
Proved optimal by Melissen (1994)[4] |
 |
| 12 |
4.029... |
0.7392... |
Proved optimal by Fodor (2000)[5] |
 |
| 13 |
4.236...  |
0.7245... |
Proved optimal by Fodor (2003)[6] |
 |
| 14 |
4.328... |
0.7474... |
Proved optimal by Ekanayake and LaFountain (2024).[7] |
 |
| 15 |
4.521...  |
0.7339... |
Conjectured optimal by Pirl (1969).[8] |
 |
| 16 |
4.615... |
0.7512... |
Conjectured optimal by Goldberg (1971).[8] |
 |
| 17 |
4.792... |
0.7403... |
Conjectured optimal by Reis (1975).[8] |
 |
| 18 |
4.863...  |
0.7609... |
Conjectured optimal by Pirl (1969), with additional arrangements by Graham, Lubachevsky, Nurmela, and Östergård (1998).[8] |
     |
| 19 |
4.863...  |
0.8032... |
Proved optimal by Fodor (1999)[9] |
 |
| 20 |
5.122... |
0.7623... |
Conjectured optimal by Goldberg (1971).[8] |
 |