ENSIKLOPEDIA
Wikipedia:RFPERM
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.
Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".
Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.
 | This version of the page may not reflect the most current changes. Please purge this page to view the most recent changes. |
Permissions
Handled here
- Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
- Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
- AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
- Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
- Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
- Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
- File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
- Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
- New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
- Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
- Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
- Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
- Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
- Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): Temporary account IP viewers are able to view the IP address information associated with temporary accounts.
Handled elsewhere
Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:
- Administrator and bureaucrat access: Requests for administrator or bureaucrat access need to be posted at requests for adminship and requests for bureaucratship, respectively.
- Bots: Request for bot flags should be made at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval.
- Edit filter: Requests for access to the edit filter manager group and the edit filter helper group should be made at Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard.
- Interface administrator: Requests for interface administrator access should be made at Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Only current administrators may become interface administrators.
- IP-block-exempt: While the IP-block-exempt right can be granted by administrators, this flag is not handled here. Requests for the IP-block exempt right should be submitted via email to the checkuser team at checkuser-en-wp
wikipedia.org or contact a CheckUser directly. - CheckUser and Oversight: These rights are only granted by the Arbitration Committee, and only after strict scrutiny. More information can be found here.
- AfC reviewer: This access is granted by administrators at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants.
- Redirect autopatrol list: Addition to the list is granted by administrators at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect autopatrol list.
- Steward permissions can only be granted in yearly elections, and are rarely given.
- Election clerk has no process for requesting it; admins can grant it to themselves or other admins at any time.
- Global permissions such as global renamer, sysop, IP block exempt, rollback, etc. should be made at meta:Steward requests/Global permissions.
Review and removal of permissions
The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:
- If you wish to have any of your permissions removed, contact an administrator
- To request a review of another editor's use of a permission, use administrative action review
- If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission, raise your concern at the administrator's noticeboard
The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.
Process
Requestors
To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.
Administrators
Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.
Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.
Other editors
Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.
A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.
Current requests
Account creator
Autopatrolled
User:Mointa Roy
- Mointa Roy (requesting Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
I'm requesting autopatrolled rights based on my creation of almost 69 articles, Four of them were apparently deleted, when I first started editing... I aim to continue producing high‑quality, well‑sourced content. Mointa Roy (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Looking through the requestor's article creations, virtually all of them are classified as stubs, and the articles from this year are all one or two sentences at the moment. Left guide (talk) 03:59, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- It also seems like the majority of them are on politicians, which are relatively easy reviews and don't put as much of a strain on new pages patrol. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:57, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Mellk
- Mellk (requesting Autopatrolled) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Came across Mellk's creation while patrolling and I believe they should be autopatrolled. They've created 262 mainspace pages with none deleted; I reviewed the last dozen or so and while some are stubs they all demonstrate notability, are reliably sourced, properly formatted, talk pages created, etc. -- they do not display any issues warranting the attention of patrollers. I do not think the issues flagged by Vanamonde93 in Mellk's AP request four years ago are still problems that should stand in the way of granting the permission. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Whonting
- Whonting (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
Still slightly below the recommended 25 articles (18 + 2), but I happen to know that this editor had autopatrolled on a previous account that they've since lost access to, so for me this is a no-brainer. Reviewing a few of their recent creations, including spot-checks of book sources where I had access to them, shows nothing but solid writing. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser
User:BilledMammal
- BilledMammal (requesting AutoWikiBrowser) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)
AWB was removed for inactivity. I have now returned and intend to use it for completing WP:LUGSTUBS2. BilledMammal (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had their access to AutoWikiBrowser automatically revoked (). — MusikBot talk 03:50, 9 April 2026 (UTC)- (I consider myself to be WP:INVOLVED here and hence unable to grant this request; some other admin should handle it) * Pppery * it has begun... 01:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Isn't this request moot due to the move functionality in AWB only being available to admins (as well as being really bad)? Trialpears (talk) 17:14, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- No, the proposed AWB action as I understand it is turning articles into redirects, not page moves. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- That would be LUGSTUBS3, if it passes; LUGSTUBS2 will involve moving the articles that are unimproved and have not already been redirected to draft space. I intend to use AWB as part of the post-move cleanup, including removing categories and applying the relevant template - moving the page will be done with a different tool. BilledMammal (talk) 00:48, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- No, the proposed AWB action as I understand it is turning articles into redirects, not page moves. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
User:Red0ctober22
- Red0ctober22 (requesting AutoWikiBrowser) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)
I made a request last month to help with work I was doing on a college basketball template, and was told to wait a month due to issues in the changes I made. Since then, there have been no issues, and I have some other copyediting tasks I want to complete for other subject areas that this tool would help me with, in addition to the college basketball work I have been doing. Red0ctober22 (talk) 12:34, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 12:40, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
User:JarJarInks
- JarJarInks (requesting AutoWikiBrowser) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)
I would like to create lists of articles I might want to edit based on Regex and categories. Because of my current computing setup I will need to use JWB, which, unlike AWB, requires being on the check page for all actions, including generating lists. I do not intend to actually make any semi-automated edits until I'm more confident in my Regex skills, and am willing to make another request when that time comes. JarJarInks٩(◕_◕)۶Tones essay 15:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Reschultzed
- Reschultzed (requesting AutoWikiBrowser) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)
I would like to use AWB to add links to pages that mention a subject when a new article on that subject is created, as I recently did manually for The Sylvee. I have substantial experience using AWB on another wiki, Bluepages, and find it much easier to use than the standard editor for small, non-automated, but repetitive tasks. -Reschultzed (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Done * Pppery * it has begun... 22:49, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
User:GreenRedFlag
- GreenRedFlag (requesting AutoWikiBrowser, Page mover) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
I have been participating Guild of Copye Editor for long time. To save time doing some tedious editing. GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:48, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Confirmed
User:TwoResponses0985
- TwoResponses0985 (requesting Confirmed) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hello! This is a legitimate alt account of User:OneReaction5890. I am requesting this account be confirmed because I have already made 10 edits and 4 days in my main account. Thanks! | Two Responses crossed the area. Anything to discuss? 23:18, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- And with my main account here, I can confirm this is true. | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 23:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Rubys06
- Rubys06 (requesting Confirmed) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Rubys06 (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Not done Reason for declining request. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:52, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Event coordinator
User:Ogundele1
- Ogundele1 (requesting Event coordinator) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · accounts created · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I am facilitating a wikipedia training for Senior Secondary schools in Osun State, Nigeria. I equally need Account Creation right so I can create accounts for students whom are participating in the training as many of the schools and guide gthem through their first edits. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Introducing_Wikipedia_to_Senior_Secondary_Schools_In_Osun_State Ogundele1 (talk) 06:55, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @Ogundele1! During which period will you be active? The page you linked says the project ended in April. Working with secondary school students is challenging, especially wuth more limited exclusieve yourself. Will you be creating new articles with them or expanding existing articles? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:03, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank @Femke, yes I will be active during this period. I will make the change on the project end date now, it was earlier proposed to end in April, but the students went on holiday which delayed the start date of the project, we just kick started the project last week. It really challenging training students, but then I love it, so I am all in to achieve success. Yes, we will be expanding existing articles and uploads medias on commons. Thank you -Ogundele1 (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- One of the important things in any outreach event is to teach students to communicate well. I noticed that you do not always leave an WP:edit summary. Could you please start doing this? You can go into your Special:Preferences and turn on reminders every time you forget. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:48, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank @Femke, yes I will be active during this period. I will make the change on the project end date now, it was earlier proposed to end in April, but the students went on holiday which delayed the start date of the project, we just kick started the project last week. It really challenging training students, but then I love it, so I am all in to achieve success. Yes, we will be expanding existing articles and uploads medias on commons. Thank you -Ogundele1 (talk) 07:08, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed
User:Happypenguins82
- Happypenguins82 (requesting Extended confirmed) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hello, I am reapplying for the Extended Confirmed permission following the resolution of an Arbitration Enforcement request the AE result from January 2026. My EC permission was previously revoked due to 'permission gaming' and a shift into contentious topics. According to the AE result, I was instructed to wait at least 30 days and complete 500 additional constructive edits before reapplying. It has now been over three months, and I’ve reached that milestone with 500 new edits. Since the initial block was removed, I’ve taken the advice I received here initial unblock request to heart and I’ve been using the "Preview" button every time before I publish changes just to double check my self, to avoid making too many small edits. I’ve focused on trying to know and better understand wikipedia, which i find fascinating, i joined a couple of projects, such as merge, redirect, short descriptions, and discovered how important it is to perform these maintenance edits to keep the encyclopedia better and safe, i plan on joining more projects, and improve my understanding of wikipedia. I'd appreciate it if you could reassess my edits and consider removing my current restrictions, and restore my EC. I would not repeat my previous mistakes. Happypenguins82 (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot talk 11:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Admins please see User talk:Newslinger#Appeal request. TarnishedPathtalk 00:43, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Happypenguins82: Which CTOP areas and/or articles that are under ECP do you want to edit? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Voorts,
- Thank you for the question. After my initial block was removed I took the time to better understand this massive platform. I've joined projects like Merges, Redirects, and Short Descriptions, every day I discover something new whether its templates or backlogs, this place is huge, and so much bigger than one single topic or a couple of them for that matter, and because I’ve discovered how important maintenance is, and good sources, and good content, I need the EC permission not for a specific single topic, but for handling technical and content related issues such as merges, or to be able to contribute quality edits to any topic I might come across, including contentious topics weather its Palestinian Israeli topic or Ukraine war or sudan or k pop figures, sports figures and music legends that might be EC protected. I discovered I like working with random options inside backlogs or articles, that's how I ended up in the PIA in the first place. but i can say that i learned so much in the past 3 months, and if I should come across a contentious topic, I would handle it with extra care and without repeating my previous mistakes. Happypenguins82 (talk) 06:53, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Let me ask you this. This is for my own interest so feel free to not answer. Would you regard it as a 'mistake' to advocate for or against any of the belligerents in the Arab-Israeli conflict in Wikipedia given that WP:NOTADVOCACY is policy? The reason I ask is because this and this resemble advocacy more than they resemble arguments based on reliable sources and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. So, I guess my question boils down to - do you think you can comply with WP:NOTADVOCACY even if you see other editors not complying (and of course you will see people not following the NOTADVOCACY rule probably everyday)? Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Of course I don't mind answering, I'm always happy to talk to fellow editors and I appreciate the question. I think everyone should follow all wikipedia's policy and guidelines, including the no advocacy policy, even if i have an opinion on the subject, or any topic for that matter its not relevant for a global encyclopedia, in here editors including myself should stick to dry secondary sourced facts, regardless to any editors opinion, however its not my place (not that im aware of) to instruct other editors how to behave. Happypenguins82 (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to answer, and I hope you succeed. Sean.hoyland (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Of course I don't mind answering, I'm always happy to talk to fellow editors and I appreciate the question. I think everyone should follow all wikipedia's policy and guidelines, including the no advocacy policy, even if i have an opinion on the subject, or any topic for that matter its not relevant for a global encyclopedia, in here editors including myself should stick to dry secondary sourced facts, regardless to any editors opinion, however its not my place (not that im aware of) to instruct other editors how to behave. Happypenguins82 (talk) 12:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Let me ask you this. This is for my own interest so feel free to not answer. Would you regard it as a 'mistake' to advocate for or against any of the belligerents in the Arab-Israeli conflict in Wikipedia given that WP:NOTADVOCACY is policy? The reason I ask is because this and this resemble advocacy more than they resemble arguments based on reliable sources and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. So, I guess my question boils down to - do you think you can comply with WP:NOTADVOCACY even if you see other editors not complying (and of course you will see people not following the NOTADVOCACY rule probably everyday)? Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Tagging @Newslinger incase they didn't see this. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Dr vulpes, thanks for the ping. I referred Happypenguins82 here for a second opinion, and do not have anything to add to User talk:Newslinger § Appeal request at this time unless anyone has additional questions. — Newslinger talk 09:23, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Poseidon sas
- Poseidon sas (requesting Extended confirmed) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I need to become extended comfirmed (WP:ECP) Poseidon sas (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Why? No admin will grant you this permission if you don't provide a good reason. Toast1454TC 16:29, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Not done You do not need extended confirmed. You can earn it by making 500 edits. Please review WP:GAMING as well. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:10, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
File mover
Mass message sender
New page reviewer
User:Morogris
- Morogris (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Mostly interested in helping with new articles created from Spanish-language sources or in my fields of interest. Promoted over 100 DYKS and have over 40 GAs, if that helps. Thanks for considering. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 20:08, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done, 3-month trial. asilvering (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Rtpaz
- Rtpaz (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I was granted the rights on a one month trial basis. So far, I’ve completed almost 100 reviews and am trying to minimize the backlog as much as possible. I hope to receive the rights permanently so that I can continue contributing to the large backlog, particularly for topics related to plants and women. I also joined for the May 2026 NPP backlog drive, so I am currently in between. Rtpaz (talk) 03:46, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Barbara (WVS)
- Barbara (WVS) (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I am asking for the permission necessary to become a new page patroller because I like the positive part of reviewing new articles and encouraging new editors. I was a page patroller before. I took a long break from editing Wikipedia and lost my privilege. I have become an active editor now and I believe I can help reduce the backlog of pages needing review. I am familiar with the page curation tools. Best Regards, Barbara ✐✉ 20:50, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Barbara (WVS), is there a reason you're asking for the right on this account and not your "personal" account? It looks to me like this account is specifically for your work as a WVS? -- asilvering (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Nikolas712
- Nikolas712 (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I would like to help patrolling new pages. I have created articles on German people. Mostly interested in German related pages. Thank you. Nikolas712 (talk) 01:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had an account for 14 days and has 463 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 02:00, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Not done Unfortunately, you do not meet the minimum requirements yet. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 03:30, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:PacificDepths
- PacificDepths (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Requesting to help with the backlog drive. I have had the NPP permission before. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 10:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done, granting through the end of the drive, happy for any admin to extend that (I didn't review very deeply) asilvering (talk) 23:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:PeriodicEditor
- PeriodicEditor (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I have been on a 1 month trial period that is set to expire next week and would like to be able to continue volunteering at NPP. PeriodicEditor (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 24 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- I've extended through to the end of the drive for now. asilvering (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Porterjoh
- Porterjoh (requesting New page reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
My 1 month expires in 7 days and I'd like to continue helping out with NPP! Thanks 🙂 Porterjoh (talk) 21:03, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 24 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 21:10, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- I've extended through to the end of the drive for now. asilvering (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Page mover
User:Squawk7700
- Squawk7700 (requesting Page mover) (t · th · c (RM/TR · RMs) · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · CSD log · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Hi! First of all I already want to apologize fore re-requesting so early (my temporary right expires June 13). I'm about the get buried under end of semester stress so I would not be able to respond to any questions in a timely manner by that time and since I already once had PMR temporary I hope that that's ok.
I think PMR is a great help in NPP and when dealing with new users occasionally, I have however also found the time/ interest to close a few RMs and help out at RMTR where it is either required or just helps a lot with e.g archives.
I have also been referred to the backlog here, reintegrating "lost" archives, which I enjoy as a much needed change from NPP and AFC occasionally.
I think and hope that there were no (bigger) issues with my moving so I would be grateful for being able to keep PMR.
Kindest Regards Squawk7700 (talk) 09:12, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Pppery (expires 01:43, 13 June 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 09:20, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 04:43, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Maltazarian
- Maltazarian (requesting Page mover) (t · th · c (RM/TR · RMs) · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · CSD log · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I'm a (fairly new) regular RM closer, and I've been told I should probably go request page mover rights already so I stop generating work for RM/TR. Having page mover rights would also be helpful in situations where additional steps need to be taken after moving a page. It really just comes down to taking workload off other editors I spent a lot of time in RM discussions, both participating and closing, and would like to say I have a pretty good grasp of article naming conventions. My track record is pretty clean; no RM/TR declines, no moves reverted and no closes overturned (although I have occasionally clarified closing rationales upon request, and I did have an incident once..) If accepted I would also volunteer to do some RM/TR work. ⹃Maltazarian ᚾparley
- Done. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 04:44, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
User:GreenRedFlag
- GreenRedFlag (requesting AutoWikiBrowser, Page mover) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
I am a retired person and enjoy writing and editing Wikipedia. Sometimes I feel the need to move pages live to the draft space, those articles that are not ready to publish, according to Wikipedia guidelines. GreenRedFlag (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
User:Mointa Roy
- Mointa Roy (requesting Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer rights and I'm really like to help keep articles under pending changes protection well maintained. I've seen some pages get vandalize or change without explanation, and I'd like to help by reviewing those edits and making sure only useful ones go through. Mointa Roy (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Hamimh2
- Hamimh2 (requesting Pending changes reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Hello! I want to be a pending changes reviewer because I made constructive edits like most of the time. I also fight vandalism with Twinkle and Ultraviolet and am familiar with polices like no original research and reliable sources and notability. Being a pending changes reviewer would help me fight more vandalism and false information. Thanks! Hamimh2 (talk) 20:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
User:CantReadRunes
- CantReadRunes (requesting Pending changes reviewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I'm a recent changes patroller with some 200 edits. Not particularly impressive, but enough to establish a track record. I would like the pending changes reviewer permission to be able to quickly accept (or reject) recent pending changes to articles. I have quite an intricate understanding of policy, and enjoy reading up on rules. I am applying per WP:PCCRITERIA, as it states "If you meet the above criteria, then ask!", and as I do, in fact, meet those criteria. Thank you! -CRR- | talk 07:56, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
User:SamKramer123
- SamKramer123 (requesting Pending changes reviewer, Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
I am requesting pending changes rights because I am an editor with about 700 edits, and have been active for over 3 years. I really enjoy reading Wikipedia articles to check for errors, and I think I would be a good candidate for the reviewer permissions. Thank you for your consideration. SamKramer123 (talk) 03:41, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Rollback
User:Qzvm
- Qzvm (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have been actively contributing and reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. I use RedWarn to fight vandalism currently. I always try to let the user know when I've reverted one of their changes. Thank you! Qzvm (T•C•S) 19:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 188 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 19:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- Not done You don't have enough experience reverting and reporting vandalism yet. With another 30 days of solid experience doing that, come back here and we'll reassess. Katietalk 21:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Feeglgeef
- Feeglgeef (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I frequently use ultraviolet for anti-vandalism, mainly patrolling recent changes, I'd like rollback to try a few of the tools that require it. Feeglgeef (talk) 00:24, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- Not done No reports to AIV since December 2025. Need to see steady AIV reports first. Katietalk 22:07, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:MrActiniuM
- MrActiniuM (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I'm kindly asking to re-apply for rollback rights because I have spent more time patrolling the new users creation log, and I do not have a recent history of edit warring. I'd also like to use Huggle, but it requires rollback permissions. MrActiniuMtalk 22:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 22:10, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Not done I think Harry meant for you to spend longer than four days between requests for this permission, so let me be plain: I want you to spent at least 30 days doing solid work reverting and reporting vandalism and/or username violations before you request this permission again. If you do that, come back here and we'll look at your contributions again. 🙂 Katietalk 22:18, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:JoBoGamer
- JoBoGamer (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 15:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 11:30, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Pppery: Up to you. Katietalk 22:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:SamKramer123
- SamKramer123 (requesting Pending changes reviewer, Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have been an active user on wikipedia for many years, and when reverting vandalism, sometimes vandals will make many changes that affect the article, and it is hard to undo every edit on its own. I use Twinkle, and I would like to use AntiVandal, however it requires rollback perms. I always leave a warning message on talk pages of users who's edits I have reverted. Thank you for the consideration. SamKramer123 (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
User:JanManisijun
- JanManisijun (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I want to experiment with some software like WikiShield to see what fits best for my CVU work. jan Manisijun (Magnesium) (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
User:AriuCH
- AriuCH (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I would like to request rollback rights. In recent weeks I’ve been patrolling Recent Changes and manually reverting clear cases of WP:Vandalism, unsourced additions against WP:BURDEN, removal of sourced material, and occasional WP:BLP‑related issues. These have been straightforward, policy‑based reversions done with WP:Undo. AriuCH (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 14:50, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Netstars22
- Netstars22 (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I've been working the recent changes patrol with a focus on anti-vandalism and I'd like access to rollback to enhance this work. I currently use Ultraviolet and sometimes Twinkle as part of my tools. I try to warn consistently and communicate if there are any questions. Thanks y'all! netstars22 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Lagtrainzzz
- Lagtrainzzz (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I have been patrolling Special:RecentChanges for a few months now. I want to be able to revert vandalism more efficiently. Lagtrainzzz (talk) 17:20, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
User:CharterTheGoob
- CharterTheGoob (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Re-applying for rollback permission, last time I was denied because I needed a bit more experience. I am now re-applying, ~200 more edits since last time, I've been making sure to notify users whose edit I've reverted. I would like rollback rights to revert vandalism quicker and more efficiently. I also would like to be able to use tools like WikiShield to assist me in counter vandalism. I've spent a majority of my time on Wikipedia doing counter vandalism and recent changes patrol, using tools like Ultraviolet and Twinkle, along with RTRC. Thank you for your time and consideration, would also like note an oversight I made, previous declined request suggested waiting a month or so (April 27th) but I'll keep this here just in case. - CharterDaGoob ✦ yer local goober ✦ yap? 15:58, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Alaexis
- Alaexis (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
As a member of the AI tools WikiProject and as an author of several user scripts, I'd like to use WikiShield to learn more about best practices in anti-vandalism tool building, both to inform my own tool development and to better understand the workflows the community relies on. Using Wikishield requires rollback permissions. As an editor, I've been using Twinkle for rollbacks occasionally and there have never been any problems. Alaexis¿question? 07:15, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Inzessin
- Inzessin (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Hello, I have been involved in reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for about a month now. I would like to gain the rollback user right in order to more efficiently combat vandalism (especially from LTAs) via a faster revert tool and access to more counter-vandalism scripts. I generally warn users when I revert their edits, and I have a good track record of reporting disruptive users to AIV.
☾⟣✦Inzessin✦⟢☽(talk) 15:55, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Elison Pokhrel
- Elison Pokhrel (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights. I have reverted vandalism many times using undo/manual reverts and regularly monitor recent changes. I understand rollback is only for obvious vandalism and disruptive edits, and I will use it carefully and responsibly. Thank you for considering my request. Elison Pokhrel TALK 16:36, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot talk 16:40, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
User:Wracking
- Wracking (requesting Rollback) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I'm a frequent Twinkle user. I leave explanations for my reverts and often also reach out to the users via Twinkle templates or a more personalized message. I mostly patrol BLPs on my watchlist, but sometimes head over to Recent Changes too. Wracking talk! 19:06, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Template editor
User:MikeVitale
- MikeVitale (requesting Template editor) (t · th · c (templates · (talk) · modules · (talk)) · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · templates created · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Following up on an upcoming expiration of TE rights. In the past couple of months, I have been more intentional about watching the Template Edit Request page and following up on a number of them. Some examples (but not all Template Edit requests I've made since February):
Thanks for your continued consideration. MikeVitale 01:39, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 5 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 01:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- I usually try to let other admins review this (especially given the past requests) but if no one else gets to this in the next few days I'll try to at least get some initial thoughts down. Primefac (talk) 13:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done Activity is still a bit on the low side but I think we've seen enough and don't need to drag this out further. I won't hold Module talk:Location map#Edit request 23 February 2026 against you since I made the same mistake. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:03, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- I usually try to let other admins review this (especially given the past requests) but if no one else gets to this in the next few days I'll try to at least get some initial thoughts down. Primefac (talk) 13:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Temporary account IP viewer
User:Insanityclown1
- Insanityclown1 (requesting Temporary account IP viewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
Would like to be able to check for signs of loutsocking on articles. I have suspicions that someone has done some very slow loutsocking on the article for Nathan Vasquez for example. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
User:I2Overcome
- I2Overcome (requesting Temporary account IP viewer) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(notify)
I occasionally encounter possible loutsocking while doing new page patrolling and AI cleanup. Most recently, I opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jabrien Beaty, and another user with TAIV commented that a couple of the TAs shared the same IP and they were all in the same city. I don’t anticipate using this too frequently, but there have now been enough times I could've used this permission myself that I think it would be worthwhile to have. I2Overcome talk 11:10, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
| Common | |
|---|---|
| Uncommon | |
| Logs | |
| Special | |
Wikipedia accounts and governance | |
|---|---|
| Unregistered users | |
| Registered users | |
| Account security | |
| Blocks, bans, sanctions, global actions | |
| Related to accounts | |
| User groups and global user groups |
|
| Advanced user groups | |
| Committees and related | |
| Governance | |