Hi Yellow Diamond! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ComatmebroUser talk:Comatmebro 04:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
If you're using WP:TWINKLE, all you have to do is click on ARV under the TW tab, and simply select sockpuppet as report type and enter the required information and it will file the report for you. If you are not using Twinkle, I highly recommend that you start using it because it has numerous features that simplify a lot of processes while editing. JDDJS (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
On 18 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kim Seong-il, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kim Seong-il believed the Japanese invasions of Korea would not take place? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kim Seong-il), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I have completed a review and moved the article to the main space. You would do well to learn how to use WP:SFN formatting and WP:Citation templates. See also Help:Shortened footnotes. When you create a reference like [1] and thereafter repeat the reference, it should look like this: [1]You'll need to open up this edit to see how it looks internally. Your repeated use of the article name followed by [1] is not right.
Please don't take this as a criticism. We all have much to learn, and it's a humongous encyclopedia with unlimited possibilities and demands.
Otherwise, well done. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:51, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the referencing instructions. I haven't actually read, now that I think about it, any instructions on referencing, I've just opened up other articles and seen how their code worked. Evidently the articles I've emulated were rather imperfect.
(Also, wasn't Cho Hon already in the main space?)--Yellow Diamond's Pearl (talk) 21:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
It was in your drafts, awaiting approval. So I don't think so.
And you should be aware of (and wary of) WP:CITEVAR. Some of our editors get stuck in their rut, and it is a trap for the unwary. I have had mixed reactions in that. I won't bore you with the details (but speaking of bore, I got positive feedback when I fixed the mess at Smith & Wesson.
And using EFN refs can give your article a whole new dimension. see Yank Levy, for example.
Best regards. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
I see it had that template, and originally, it was a userspace draft. But it was already in the mainspace, albeit unreviewed, before you edited it. --Yellow Diamond's Pearl (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
As to page numbers, the format you added introduced "Harvard errors." You are supposed to be able to click on the link to the book, and it then highlights the book. What you did messed up that function. Also, hypothetically, when you put in [2] You can add in within brackets [URL 392] if you have a URL for the specific page, and this will display as a link to that URL. I apologize for burdening you with too much. But I don't know that many editors know that trick, which I discovered on my own. Best. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Yellow Diamond. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hello, Yellow Diamond. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You have previously participated in discussions about the use of gendered pronouns in the biography of Albert Cashier. An Rfc about this topic is taking place at Talk:Albert Cashier, and your comments are welcome. Mathglot (talk) 18:38, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Yellow Diamond. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Yellow Diamond Jjc2002 here. As you may have figured out I'm not computer savvy and didn't know how to insert the link to the Steve Sailer article. I'm not ever sure that this is right way to message you. I'd be obliged if you could do it for me.
Could you tell me what exactly that site is? I went onto it, deleting the part after ".net" and it looks very low tech - is it an archive?--Yellow DiamondΔ Direct Line to the Diamonds 21:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your signature and linter errors
Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User: Yellow Diamond|Yellow Diamond]] <span style="color:yellow;">Δ</span>[[User talk: Yellow Diamond|<small> Direct Line to the Diamonds</small>]] ASAP.
The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. See WP:SIGFONT for more info.
If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk • he/him) 09:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome Yellow Diamond! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
March 2026 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
Citation Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Yellow Diamond for collecting more than 40 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's March 2026 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing over 8362 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer■ 16:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
