Hello, IgnacyPL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
Task Center–need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.Woodroar (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Max Kolonko
Hi IgnacyPL, I'm afraid I've had to revert your edit again at Max Kolonko. Open wikis like Fandom aren't reliable sources. We're looking for sources like peer-reviewed journals, mainstream news media and newspapers, and so on. You can read more about sourcing at WP:RS and see some examples of reliable (and unreliable) sources at WP:RSP. I hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 12:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
But what else do I have to prove? After all, their names are almost identical, and besides, on the Internet on many websites you will find information that the name Max Kolanko is an obvious reference to Max Kolonko. There is nothing to prove here, because it is logical! So please restore my edit, ok? IgnacyPL (talk) 14:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Please answer me: What should I do to get you to agree to restore my edit? IgnacyPL (talk) 09:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
You could find independent, reliable sources that discuss the reference in some detail. I've looked and didn't find any but you might have more luck. Woodroar (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
I would very much like this information about Max Kolonko to be accepted, please agree. It is very interesting that in The Penguins of Madagascar there is a reference to someone from Poland. IgnacyPL (talk) 20:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Please answer. Please IgnacyPL (talk) 10:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Why are you spreading this false information about the Prime Minister of my country, Poland? I won't allow one of the most important people in Poland to be insulted like that, that's why I deleted this strange information that the Prime Minister of Poland is a zombie and the fact that he was in power for 2 weeks is not encyclopedic style, so it should also be removed, besides NO ONE IN POLAND HE USES SUCH TERMS IN RELATION TO THE PRIME MINISTER OF POLAND OR OTHER MINISTERS, so these are propaganda and false content insulting Poland and Polish politics, and I deleted them for the good of Poland, not because of vandalism. So I think you will agree with me that this false and propaganda information about the Prime Minister and other ministers should be deleted, right? IgnacyPL (talk) 08:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi IgnacyPL! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minorat Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
You are still misusing the minor edit tag. Please note that users who regularly abuse the tag after being asked to stop can be blocked for disruptive editing. DrKay (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I did it out of habit, I ask for forgiveness and I promise to do better. IgnacyPL (talk) 22:19, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello IgnacyPL! Your additions to Joan Kennedy Taylor have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa🍁(talk) 13:20, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensingrequires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:
NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.
Warning 1 - Removal of sourced content without reason
Hello, I'm Austragar. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Austragar (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Please refrain from deleting center-right on the civic coalition page as it is sourced.
Not only that there was no description behind your edit. Austragar (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seweryn, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Severinus was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ• Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Apple Premium Reseller. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. •Quinn(talk) 20:19, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Ok, thank you very much for your help, I will try to develop this article as best as I can. 😊 IgnacyPL (talk) 21:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
LLM use
Hi IgnacyPL, can I ask if you used a LLM for this edit? If so, see WP:NOLLM, LLM use is not allowed on Wikipedia Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 21:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
I have my doubts whether this is an encyclopaedic subject at all, but if it is, we need to see significant coverage of the concept of APR in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. Currently this draft cites no such source.
Hello, IgnacyPL!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
On this page in the infobox, you called an undefined note, name=establishment. Do you know what you meant by this, or if you copied it from another page, which page it was? Thanks Freddieh9 (talk) 01:11, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
