Hi ConductorDeAutobus. Thank you for your work on Plopski. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under wP:BLP, please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:SPORTSBIO. Additionally, please fix the bare URLs. Thanks and have a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
An article you recently created, Mopoz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TURKEYDICAE🦃 20:35, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Can you specify what information is not referenced? I'm pretty sure I used reliable counter strike portals for every statement. ConductorDeAutobus (talk) 08:31, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Plopski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TURKEYDICAE🦃 20:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Alejandro Masanet. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more reliable, independent sources.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. –Pbrks(t·c) 12:34, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Drafts
Please note that drafts such as Draft:Sunpayus are not allowed to be filed in categories alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories while it's in draft, and may be added to categories only if and when the page gets accepted and moved by an WP:AFC reviewer. Any categories on a draft must be present solely in disabled form, so that they function as a text link to the category without filing the page in the category — so enabling the categories on a draft is breaking things, not "fixing" them, because drafts aren't allowed to be in categories.
As I've already had to remove the page from categories twice within barely one hour, do not readd it to categories again, because it isn't allowed to be in categories. This is also a rule that there can be consequences on the grounds of disruption if you disregard, such as the draft being locked down so that you can no longer edit it at all and/or the temporary or permanent removal of your editing privileges. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Next time leave me a message the first time, I wasn't aware of that ConductorDeAutobus (talk) 16:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Masanet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks for your contributions to SunPayus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs reliable, independent sources that contain significant coverage of the subject. Many of the sources also lead to deadlinks.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. –Pbrks(t·c) 15:49, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mopoz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.
