Hello, Bergsonn!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Bergsonn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 10:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rolls-Royce Camargue, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rolls-Royce Camargue, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello, I'm LuniZunie. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Rolls-Royce Camargue that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.– LuniZunie(talk) 15:54, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
I commented on Mr Chopper's edits today to the new expanded section on Reception on the Camargue page. He deleted it all and so destroyed two days of my work and research. Is that civil? How do I report vandalism like this? Bergsonn (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
LuniZunie, I didn't see the incivility. Bergsonn, those edits were not vandalism; they were explained and IMO they were justified. FYI, we can't go around using LinkedIn and Facebook as references. Drmies (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
@Drmies I must have misclicked, I remember seeing this edit and being suspicious at first, but decided it was fine. – LuniZunie(talk) 19:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
I will drop using linkedin and facebook as references (I did not know). But the 'explanation' from Mr Chopper was inadequate for his deletions. He simply said I was biased, without evidence. But I am trying to update the article. Attitudes to the Camargue have fundamentally changed in the last decade, as I cited in new works by Buckley, King, Butt, Kilbertus, Camissa, Harris, and others. This article originally cites 4 negative and 1 positive view. Now that is bias. Anyone who has read King, who wrote the definite account of the car in 2019, will know that this entry needs to be updated not more outdated prejudice. I am not biased at all but simply reading the evidence. How do we adjudicate this? -Bergsonn 20:33, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Well, that's just not correct: Mr.choppers explained their edit quite clearly. Also, please remember to log in. Drmies (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
@Drmies There is still a comment on my page under the TA. – LuniZunie(talk) 21:02, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
@Drmies One last thing, my edit summaries on my user talk page still have the TA account. – LuniZunie(talk) 21:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
He deleted 7555 characters with the explanation 'let's not be biased' . Is that good enough? I was correcting a bias (4 negative comments to 1) with over 6 validating sources to create balance. Bergsonn (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
@Bergsonn Sorry, I apologize for this. I left a response on my talk page. – LuniZunie(talk) 19:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Sorry for the false warning. Here's a kitten that I hope can help make up for it =)
