ENSIKLOPEDIA

Tekan Enter untuk memulai pencarian cepat.

Kembali ke Ensiklopedia Arsip Wikipedia Indonesia

User:VortexPhantom

A editor from India

This user participates in WikiProject Hinduism.

VortexPhantom #0007

Chilled ⚡

About me

A Wikipedia Editor

Userboxes

This user is a reviewer at
WikiProject Articles for creation.

This user has temporary account IP viewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This account is controlled and overseen by a editor from Uttar Pradesh.

My Journey

My journey on Wikipedia started from January 2025. My first edit came up while I was reading a article and found that editing is allowed on Wikipedia. My one of first edit was on article Science Olympiad Foundation, which was reverted by a editor. I was very disappointed at that time, because I really worked hard, and learned how to edit, but was reverted because of original research. I also created a draft, that I know today that it can never qualify as article, but I didn't know that time, due to this my draft was repeatedly rejected. This was the major turning point, since I find many guildlines and policies, due to that incident.

I also found that these are enforced by the editor like me. One of the first flags I had was rollback, I was given this right due to my experience in recent changes and handling vandalism, I examined the request at WP:PERM/ROLLBACK, and practised to get skills for that right. Very soon I got pending changes reviewer rights. These early achievements were very motivating for me, this is when I found myself to be useful for Wikipedia community.

In June 2025, I was not able to contribute and predicted that I may take a long time before coming back. Hence, I request revocation of my flags. However, it didn't took that much time, and eventually returned on July 2025, roughly 1 and half months. However I didn't actively contributed till January 2026, this time I didn't request revocation. 2026 will be a very happy year for me, January was the comeback year, immediately I applied for AFC reviewer, I am kept on hold as probationary reviewer, possibly due to my experience in AFD.

Wikipedia:Babel

en-2

This user can contribute with an intermediate level of English.

hi-4

इस उपयोगकर्ता को हिन्दी भाषा का लगभग मातृभाषिक स्तर पर ज्ञान है।

sa-1

उपयोजकोयम् उपयोजिकेयं वा सरलेन संस्कृतेन लेखितुं शक्नोति।

Search user languages

Areas of Interest

Physics
Maths
Chemistry
India-related topics

Major Contributions :

Muzaffarpur Junction railway station

Page that I have created

India-Nepal Railway Connectivity project
Atal Canteen scheme

Toolbox (Accessing my contribution )

v t e User toolbox for VortexPhantom
General	user talk email edit analysis non-automated edits BLP edits policy & guideline edits user groups global user groups blocked? user space user talk space CentralAuth global account info they/them
Skin customizations	common: .js / .css Vector: .js / .css Vector-2022: .js / .css Minerva: .js / .css Timeless: .js / .css MonoBook: .js / .css global: .js / .css
Requests / Investigations	RfAs RfBs RFARs (pre-2009) RFARs (post-2009) RfC/Us RfCUs SSPs SPIs CCI BRFAs (if bot) editor reviews administrator reviews RfA votes AfD votes XfD votes
History	contributions deleted contributions global contributions logs moves uploads pages patrolled accounts created review log pending changes log registration time userpage log block log rights log meta thanks given received edit summary usage global account log global rights log global block log global blocks disabled/enabled filter log examine past edits edit filter changes articles created top article edits oversights rights AfC log CSD log Draftify log PROD log SPI helper log XfD log
Admin history	protections blocks deletions rights changes interface contributions imports global blocks disabled/enabled
Bureaucrat history	user renames rights changes
Steward history	rights changes global right changes global account changes global blocks
Actions	block flag rename mass delete globally block globally unblock disable global blocks locally

Resources for New Editors

Extended content

T
O
O
L
B
O
X

Delete: {{db|...}} • {{db-nonsense}} • {{db-empty}} • {{db-userreq}}
{{db-attack}} • {{db-bio}} • {{db-test}} • {{db-notenglish}} • {{db-repost}}
{{db-band}} • {{db-club}} • {{db-copyvio|url=url of source}} • {{db-vand}}
{{db-redirtypo}} • {{db-redirnone}} • {{db-blanked}} • {{db-talk}} • DLog

AfD: {{subst:afd1}}
{{subst:afd2 | pg=PageName | cat= | text=Reason for deletion--~~~~}}
{{subst:afd3 | pg=PageName}} AfDCat • Precedents • AfD
NOTE ~ Bio • Books • CB • Corp • Fict • Music • Neo • NFT • Prof • Web

CV: {{copyvio | url=insert URL}}--~~~~
{{subst:article-cv | PageName}} from [insert URL]--~~~~ CP

{{nothanks}} • {{nothanks-}} • {{nothanks-sd}} • {{nothanks-add}}

Warn (old): {{test0}} • {{test}} • {{test2}} • {{test2a}} • {{blatantvandal}}
{{verror2}} • {{verror3}} • {{spam}} • {{drmafd2}} • {{drmafd3}} • {{selftest}}
{{blank}} • {{ConflictOfInterest}} • {{mess2}} • {{nn-warn}} • {{nn-test}}
{{comment2}} • {{RPA}} • {{defwarn}} • {{PRODWarning}}
{{polite-afd}} • {{Edit summary personal}} • {{summary}} • {{nn-notice}}

Warn (new): • {{uw-vandal1}} • {{uw-delete1}} • {{uw-test1}} • {{uw-upv1}}
{{uw-tpv1}} • {{uw-error1}} • {{uw-npa1}} • {{uw-joke1}} • {{uw-biog1}}
{{uw-defamatory1}} • {{uw-npov1}} • {{uw-spam1}} • {{uw-copyright1}}
{{uw-creation1}} • {{uw-image1}} • {{uw-move1}} • {{uw-agf1}}
{{uw-mos1}} • {{uw-notcensored1}} • {{uw-unsourced1}} • {{uw-afd1}}
{{uw-speedy1}} • {{empty-warn}} • {{spam-warn}} • {{nn-warn}}
{{recreated}} • {{test1article}} • {{test-self}} ∞ testtemplates↔WP:UTM

Article tags: {{advert}} • {{tone}} • {{verify}} • {{Citation needed}} • {{Cleanup}}
{{Confusing}} • {{Context}} • {{disputed}} • {{POV}} • {{Wikify}} • {{Diagram needed}}
{{Expert}} • {{Hoax}} • {{Inappropriate person}} • {{Notability}} • {{Inappropriate tone}}
{{Inuse}} • {{Intro length}} • {{Not verified}} • {{Unreferenced}}

Category and stub: categories • Stubcats • Stubs • Templates

Policy/useful: WP:CSD • WP:TEMP • WP:MOS • WP:MWS • WP:MWA
WP:NOT • WP:CB • WP:CR • WP:HD • WP:CP • New • Cpydt • Prefix
MyEdits • Edits • Interiot's • GSearch • Correct • CProd • Hme • WP:DPL

External: Alexa • Google • Wiki Search • Google Images • IMDB • Dictionary
OneLook • World Maps • Music • ConvertRef • MetaTable

Cite: Cite • {{Cite web}} • {{Cite journal}} • {{Cite book}} • CITET

Requests: adminship • arbitration • checkuser • comment • de-adminship
deletion • expansion • investigation • mediation • move • protection
translation • undeletion • Block • FAC • GAC • CSurvey • PLib • SpTrans

Wikipedia essays (?)

Building, editing, and deletion

Philosophy	Articles are more important than policy Articles must be written All Five Pillars are equally important Avoid vague introductions Civil POV pushing Cohesion Competence is required Concede lost arguments Dissent is not disloyalty Don't lie Don't search for objections Duty to comply Editing Wikipedia is like visiting a foreign country Editors will sometimes be wrong Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Explanationism External criticism of Wikipedia Five pillars Here to build an encyclopedia Leave it to the experienced Levels of competence Levels of consensus Most ideas are bad Need Not broken is ugly Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction Not every article can be a Featured Article The one question Oversimplification Paradoxes Pave the path Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Process is important Product, process, policy Purpose Reasonability rule Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta We are absolutely here to right great wrongs Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is a community Wikipedia is not RationalWiki Wikipedia is written by humans, for humans
Article construction	100K featured articles Abandoned stubs Acronym overkill Adding images improves the encyclopedia Advanced text formatting Akin's Laws of Article Writing Alternatives to the "Expand" template Amnesia test A navbox on every page An unfinished house is a real problem Archive your sources Article revisions Articles have a half-life Autosizing images Avoid mission statements Be neutral in form Beef up that first revision Blind men and an elephant BOLD, revert, discuss cycle Build content to endure Cherrypicking Chesterton's fence Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books Citation overkill Citation underkill Common-style fallacy Concept cloud Creating controversial content Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability Dictionaries as sources Don't cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia Don't demolish the house while it's still being built Don't get hung up on minor details Don't hope the house will build itself Don't panic Don't "teach the controversy" Editing on mobile devices Editors are not mindreaders Encourage the newcomers Endorsements (commercial) Featured articles may have problems Formatting bilateral relations articles Formatting bilateral relations templates Fruit of the poisonous tree Give an article a chance Gotfryd custom How to write a featured article Identifying and using independent sources History sources Law sources Primary sources Science sources Style guides Tertiary sources Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats Introduction to structurism Link rot Mine a source Merge Test Minors and persons judged incompetent "Murder of" articles Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography Not everything needs a navbox Not everything needs a template Nothing is in stone Obtain peer review comments Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area Permastub Potential, not just current state Presentism Principle of Some Astonishment The problem with elegant variation Pro and con lists Printability Publicists Put a little effort into it Restoring part of a reverted edit Robotic editing Sham consensus Source your plot summaries Specialized-style fallacy Spoons versus forks Stublet Stub Makers Run an edit-a-thon Temporary versions of articles Tertiary-source fallacy There are no shortcuts to neutrality There is no deadline There is a deadline The deadline is now Try not to leave it a stub What is a reliable source Understanding Wikipedia's content standards Walled garden What an article should not include Wikipedia is a work in progress Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion The world will not end tomorrow Write the article first Writing better articles
Writing article content	Avoid thread mode Copyediting reception sections Coup Don't throw more litter onto the pile Gender-neutral language Myth vs fiction Proseline Reading in a flow state Turning biology research into a Wikipedia article Use our own words We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions Write the article first Writing about women Writing better articles
Removing or deleting content	Adjectives in your recommendations AfD is not a war zone Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions Arguments to make in deletion discussions Avoid repeated arguments Before commenting in a deletion discussion But there must be sources! Confusing arguments mean nothing Content removal Counting and sorting are not original research Delete or merge Delete the junk Deletion is not cleanup Does deletion help? Don't attack the nominator Don't confuse stub status with non-notability Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument Emptying categories out of process Follow the leader How the presumption of notability works How to save an article nominated for deletion I just don't like it Identifying blatant advertising Identifying test edits Immunity Keep it concise Liar liar pants on fire No Encyclopedic Use Notability is not everything Nothing Nothing is clear Overzealous deletion Relisting can be abusive Relist bias The Heymann Standard Unopposed AFD discussion Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole Why was the page I created deleted? What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork Zombie page

Civility

The basics	Accepting other users Apology Autistic editors Being right isn't enough Contributing to complicated discussions Divisiveness Don't retaliate Editors' pronouns Edit at your own pace Encouraging the newcomers Enjoy yourself Expect no thanks How to be civil Maintaining a friendly space Negotiation Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors Please say please Relationships with academic editors Thank you Too long; didn't read Truce Unblock perspectives We are all Wikipedians here You have a right to remain silent
Philosophy	A thank you never hurts A weak personal attack is still wrong Advice for hotheads An uncivil environment is a poor environment Be the glue Beware of the tigers! Civility warnings Deletion as revenge Duty to comply Failure Forgive and forget It's not the end of the world Nobody cares Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals On Wikipedia no one knows you're a dog Old-fashioned Wikipedian values Profanity, civility, and discussions Revert notification opt-out Shadowless Fists of Death! Staying cool when the editing gets hot The grey zone The last word There is no Divine Right of Editors Most ideas are bad Nothing is clear Reader The rules of polite discourse There is no common sense Two wrongs don't make a right Wikipedia clichés Wikipedia is not about winning Wikipedia should not be a monopoly Writing for the opponent
Dos	Assume good faith Assume the assumption of good faith Assume no clue Avoid personal remarks Avoid the word "vandal" Be a humble article creator Be excellent to one another Be pragmatic Beyond civility Call a spade a spade Candor Deny recognition Desist Discussing cruft Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass Encourage full discussions Get over it How to lose Imagine others complexly Just drop it Keep it concise Keep it down to earth Mind your own business Say "MOBY" Mutual withdrawal Read before commenting Read the room Settle the process first You can search, too
Don'ts	Wikipedia:Because I can Civil POV pushing Cyberbullying Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack Don't be a fanatic Don't be a jerk Don't be an ostrich Don't be ashamed Don't be a WikiBigot Don't be high-maintenance Don't be inconsiderate Don't be obnoxious Don't be prejudiced Don't be rude Don't be the Fun Police Don't bludgeon the process Don't call a spade a spade Don't call people by their real name Don't call the kettle black Don't call things cruft Don't come down like a ton of bricks Don't cry COI Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify Don't eat the troll's food Don't fight fire with fire Don't give a fuck Don't help too much Don't ignore community consensus Don't knit beside the guillotine Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature Don't remind others of past misdeeds Don't shout Don't spite your face Don't take the bait Don't template the regulars Don't throw your toys out of the pram Do not insult the vandals Don't teach your grandmother to suck eggs Griefing Hate is disruptive Jew-tagging Nationalist editing No angry mastodons just madmen No ableism No Nazis No racists No Confederates No queerphobia No, you can't have a pony Passive aggression POV railroad Superhatting There are no oracles There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns You can't squeeze blood from a turnip UPPERCASE
WikiRelations	WikiBullying WikiCrime WikiHarassment WikiHate WikiLawyering WikiLove WikiPeace

Neutrality

Academic bias
Activist
Advocacy
Avoid thread mode
Be neutral in form
Blind men and an elephant
Cherrypicking
Civil POV pushing
Coatrack
Controversial articles
Creating controversial content
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
Criticism
Describing points of view
Don't "teach the controversy"
Endorsements
Let the reader decide
Inaccuracy
Myth vs fiction
NPOV dispute
Neutral and proportionate point of view
Not Wikipedia's fault
POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
Partisans
Partisanship
Presentism
Pro and con lists
Systemic bias
Tendentious editing
There are no shortcuts to neutrality
Wikipedia:Truth
We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
What is fringe?
Why Wikipedia cannot claim the Earth is not flat
Wikipedia is not RationalWiki
Yes, it is promotion

Notability

Advanced source searching
All high schools can be notable
Alternative outlets
Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
Articles with a single source
Avoid template creep
Bare notability
Big events make key participants notable
Businesses with a single location
But it's true!
Common sourcing mistakes
Clones
Coatrack
Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
Every snowflake is unique
Existence ≠ Notability
Existence does not prove notability
Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
Google searches and numbers
How the presumption of notability works
High schools
Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
Independent sources
Inherent notability
Insignificant
Just because BFDI has an article doesn't mean you can add fancruft about it
Masking the lack of notability
Make stubs
Minimum coverage
News coverage does not decrease notability
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
No one cares about your garage band
No one really cares
Notability and tornadoes
Notability cannot be purchased
Notability comparison test
Notability is not everything
Notability is not a level playing field
Notability is not a matter of opinion
Notability is not relevance or reliability
Notability means impact
Notabilitymandering
Not all Vocaloid songs deserve their own article
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
No special considerations
Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
Offline sources
One sentence does not an article make
Overreliance upon Google
Perennial websites
Popularity ≠ Notability
Read the source
Red flags of non-notability
Reducing consensus to an algorithm
Run-of-the-mill
Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
Significance is not a formula
Source content comes first!
Sources must be out-of-universe
Subjective importance
Slow news day
Third-party sources
Trivial mentions
Video links
Vanispamcruftisement
What BLP1E is not
What is and is not routine coverage
What notability is not
What to include
Why was BFDI not on Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is not Crunchbase
Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé
Two prongs of merit
Two sources are good enough

Humorous

Adminitis
Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
Akin's Laws of Article Writing
Alternatives to edit warring
ANI flu
Anti-Wikipedian
Anti-Wikipedianism
Articlecountitis
Asshole John rule
Assume bad faith
Assume faith
Assume good wraith
Assume stupidity
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
Avoid using the preview button
Avoid using wikilinks
Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
Barnstaritis
Before they were notable
Be the fun police
BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle
Boston Tea Party
Butterfly effect
CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
Case against LLM-generated articles
Complete bollocks
Counting forks
Counting juntas
Crap
Delete the main page
Diffusing conflict
Don't stuff beans up your nose
Don't-give-a-fuckism
Don't abbreviate "Wikipedia" as "Wiki"!
Don't delete the main page
Editcountitis
Edits Per Day
Editsummarisis
Editing under the influence
Embrace Stop Signs
Emerson
Fart
Five Fs of Wikipedia
Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
Go ahead, vandalize
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
How to get away with UPE
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
How to vandalize correctly
How to win a citation war
If you have a pulse
Ignore all essays
Ignore all user warnings
Ignore every single rule
Is that even an essay?
Keep beating the horse
List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create
Mess with the templates
My local pond
Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
Legal vandalism
List of jokes about Wikipedia
LTTAUTMAOK
No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
No episcopal threats
No one cares about your garage band
No one really cares
No, really
No self attacks
Notability is not eternal
Oops Defense
Play the game
Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
Please bite the newbies
Please do not murder the newcomers
Pledge of Tranquility
Project S.C.R.A.M.
R-e-s-p-e-c-t
Requests for medication
Requirements for adminship
Rouge admin
Rouge editor
Sarcasm is really helpful
Sausages for tasting
Spaling Muich?
Template madness
The first rule of Wikipedia
The Five Pillars of Untruth
The Night Before Wikimas
The Truth
Things that should not be surprising
The WikiBible
Watchlistitis
We are deletionist!
Why is BFDI on Wikipedia?
Why you shouldn't write articles with ChatGPT, according to ChatGPT
Wikipedia is an MMORPG
WTF? OMG! TMD TLA. ARG!
Yes, falsely
Yes legal threats
Yes personal attacks
You don't have to be mad to work here, but
You should not write meaningless lists

About

About essays	Essay guide Value of essays Difference between policies, guidelines and essays Don't cite essays as if they were policy Avoid writing redundant essays Finding an essay Quote your own essay
Policies and guidelines	About policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance Policy writing is hard

Essay search

Barnstar

Here is list of barnstars that is given to me by community. For any issues with my contribution, please contact my talk page.

Extended content

About Me


Wikipedia ads	file info – #135

VortexPhantom
Active

—

Rollbacker
Pending changes reviewer —

Name

Undisclosed

Nationality

Country

Current location

Languages

Time zone

Indian Standard Time +GMT 5:30

Current time

Current UTC is 06:16

Hair

Black

Hobbies, interests, and beliefs

Religion

Hinduism

Account statistics

Autoconfirmed

05/02/2025

Extended confirmed

14/04/2025

Pending changes reviewer

24/04/2025

Rollbacker

07/04/2025

Permissions

Y Extended confirmed user

Y Rollbacker

Y Pending changes reviewer

Signature

✓ortexPhantom (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2026 (UTC) PhantomVortex (Contact here) 03:08, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Userboxes

Extended content

en-2

This user can contribute with an intermediate level of English.

This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user plays chess.

This user comes from India.

en-2

This user can contribute with an intermediate level of English.

CSS-3

This user is an advanced Cascading Style Sheets user.

py-2

This user is an intermediate Python programmer.

This user can program in JavaScript.

This editor is a
**Novice Editor**
and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

Wikipedia editor

This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:VortexPhantom.

	Released into public domain
	I agree to release my text and image contributions, unless otherwise stated, into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under public domain terms, please check the multi-licensing guide.

Sumber data: id.wikipedia.org via REST API v1