Splitting discussion for WGN-TV

An article that been involved with (WGN-TV) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (History of WGN-TV). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Packers Shareholder Meeting

Any chance you're going to be attending the Packers Shareholder meeting tomorrow? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Discussion at Draft talk:Impact of the September 11 attacks on entertainment § Was the point to create a new article or re-write the existing list?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Draft talk:Impact of the September 11 attacks on entertainment § Was the point to create a new article or re-write the existing list?. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 10:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Wish List

I think consensus had changed and TV shows, even on national networks, are not automatically notable. What do you think? Bearian (talk) 20:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WBOC-LD Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WBOC-LD Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WKAQ-DT3 Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WKAQ-DT3 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Close at WP:Articles for deletion/Maakgalake Pholwane

I made a slight formatting change to your close at this AfD. It's a speedy keep (see WP:CSK) and by using the term speedy keep in the close, the AfD stats tool will be able to process it. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Plant-based_cat_food

I'd like to ask you give your redirect recommendation of plant-based cat food another look.

In general, as to my comment on the discussion page:

• This topic deserves it's own page as an article spin-off WP:SPINOFF. Adding all the relevant information that is worthy of Wikipedia to the existing cat food page would make it too large and probably put WP:UNDUE weight on the cat food article.

This is a new page accepted only 2 months ago for which I have not yet gotten to the point of fully splitting the content out of the original cat food page. I request more time to complete this and to leave the page in place right now

Specifically on your comment: The article start actually points out that plant-based cat food is characterized by the lack of animal products, and calls out synthetic and mineral sources as ingredients too.

Reliable sources have been used, and the tone reflects the research available on the topic, rather than the view of any ideology. At least that is what I aimed to do and fine tune with the help of the AfC process. I feel that the reporter's representation of the article is incorrect and very biased, all I ask is that you judge this young article on its merit. Sklabb (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Survey

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond. Czarking0 (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD! As you may have seen in my previous message, I am conducting a survey. Several editors have responded already and I do not want their hard work to go to waste. If you could take a few moments to make your voice hear please check this survey.

Don't worry I won't send you another reminder.Czarking0 (talk) 02:49, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

A ferret for you!

	The substantial ferret
	We should all have a ferret. Or two. Polygnotus (talk) 07:47, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Statement on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Iryna Zarutska

The nom was closed early an hour ago as a keep, and I have no issue with it at all as the mainstream newscast and further RS mentions/analysis solidified notability and my vote was made well before there was more attention on it, some of it which brought unexpected attention to the AfD process. I also emphasize that my vote was never political and was made well before it was raised as having a political connection (see the unrelated other crime AfDs I voted on at the same time as part of a wave that happened to take place that day before that nomination was made). Removed my userpage for now as it was attracting unwanted attention (it needs cleanup anyways and is well-outmoded in design) and because of off-site transphobia; just taking a temporary break, and I apologize if my views were too strong within the nomination. I'm self-banning myself from current true crime AfDs for the time being as they are getting overheated and political, and are headed into sanction area territory I never expected. Nathannah • 📮 00:15, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Saw someone being transphobic and directly linking your User Profile on Twitter (While incorrectly stating that you created the AfD). Came to check the account out and tell you to be well and ignore the noise. Although I do not agree with your AfD post directly, attacking someone for who they are is freakish behavior. All of the people off platform are cowardice IRL and want some internet points doing whatever they can. Blod722 (talk) 02:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion

Sir, I read your answer well during the AfD Discussion for Cast AI. Can I ask your opinion as an experienced editor - for my mental sanity. Would you personally nominate this company page Adagio Teas for deletion (created 2 days ago) considering that 9 out of 10 of their sources are either a company website or start with the likes of TRENTON, New Jersey (disguised press release)? Silvymaro (talk) 14:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WLDB Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WLDB Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Grigorirasputinlover (talk) 16:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KMCI Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:KMCI Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KUTP 2018 Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:KUTP 2018 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WJZY 2013 Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WJZY 2013 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:20, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

KAAL studio location

Wow, this one ended up being deeper than I could put in an edit summary. Barclay Square apparently was a former enclosed mall, which was renamed and converted to a strip mall in the 1990s.^[1] I found references that indicate TJ Maxx Plaza is the current name or at least more current than Barclay Square.^[2] A movie theater there used the name into the 1990s or 2000s. The signs on the center don't give a name.

The bigger issue is that the name failed verification in connection to KAAL and with the existing references provided. Pages like KAAL are earmarked for someday an appearance at WP:GAN. You can't go adding things that aren't already in the existing sources without new sources. I'd be fine removing the TJ Maxx mention out of the lead, though.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 17:51, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WRBW 2019 Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WRBW 2019 Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Temporary account IP viewer granted

Hello, Nathannah. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Sohom (talk) 17:27, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSAS Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:KSAS Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WTTA Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WTTA Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

CSD G10

G10 requires that the page be "entirely negative in tone and unsourced". The McDonnell case article is not unsourced, so I don't think it qualifies for that. It will need to go to AfD to be deleted. 331dot (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television shows considered the best

Hi! There is a deletion discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television shows considered the best.

I am notifying everyone who

1. participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television series considered the best in 2017
2. Has made at least one edit in the last 12 months
3. Isn't already participating in the new AfD.

--Guy Macon (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WSIL-TV Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WSIL-TV Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Toyota guy

Hello, Nathannah

I edit here too, under the username HurricaneZeta and it's nice to meet you 🙂

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Toyota guy, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 1 § Toyota guy.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|HurricaneZeta}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HurricaneZeta^C 18:44, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Problem on Commons regarding you, me, and other users (as sockpuppets)

So apparenty, me, @Mvcg66b3r, and 2 other users were blocked because they kept they are sockpuppet accounts of you: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Nathannah and on his talk page it seems: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mvcg66b3r

And also, I don't even know how I've been involved since I've only been on here for like almost 3 years and if we were sockpuppets of you, isn't it weird we're not blocked on this main Wikipedia? Also, your account would've been blocked already on there, I don't know, there's something strange and fishy coming on here.

@Sammi Brie, and @Nathan Obral seems to have tried to fight back to no avail and it seems like the only way for this mutiny to be cleared is you need to talk to @Jameslwoodward (the user who blocked Mvcg66b3r, and @Lymantria (the user who blocked me and the 2 other users). OWaunTon (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Huh? Y'all got banned for being "sockpuppets"? What was/is happening for that to happen, and... I have no words for any of this, just what?! mer764KC / Cospaw⛲️ (He/Him | 💬Talk! • 📦Contributions) 16:15, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

I have no idea, they say all accounts of Nathannah, which is completely false. OWaunTon (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know this morning because I was completely in the dark this was happening with no notifications at all. I am just confused and a bit angered about this happening without any cause or real reason shared as to the suspicions. Nathannah • 📮 16:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

You didn't know, @Nathannah?! Then yeah, somebody is trying to slander your name and ban anyone that knows or edits similar to you it seems.

Somebody needs to lose their adminship over at Commons for defamation or something. OWaunTon (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@Nathannah and @OWaunTon - It's also blatant discrimination at mvcg, who is neurodivergent and has difficulty communicating at times, which Sammi and I have had to assist him with. Of course he's going to have trouble defending a block and needs character witnesses! What is infuriating is how James Woodward is so utterly convinced in his views and is talking down to me and Sammi in almost a mocking way. It is a black eye on Wikimedia that needs to be addressed. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 16:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

I am too but at least I understand and work through the process, where Mvcg definitely needs guidance but is a productive editor. How can they see that my mostly static IP is a 'proxy' at all, and that I only log onto Commons when I upload images or see an issue with an image I see on en.wiki compared to him, who has their own behavior that is completely different? 16:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC) Nathannah • 📮 16:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@OWaunTon I did not know you were banned as well! Good freaking grief. What is up with these CUs? Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 16:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't know, but something needs to be done and now!

Because this is absolutely outrageous! OWaunTon (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Honestly, I am shocked and disappointed in the behaviour of these CUs, and I know Sammi Brie is as well. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 16:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

And @Nathan Obral and @Nathannah, for the record, I'm in Oklahoma, and just turned 18 a couple months and that's all I'm disclosing if that helps anything since I can't say anything on Commons. OWaunTon (talk) 18:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@OWaunTon - I threw in a support for your unblock request. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 20:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

This is not how we wanted to start the new year! OWaunTon (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Cutting through all the comments above is the fact that two checkusers, myself and Lymantria, have confirmed. Nathannah and Mvcg66b3r are either sockpuppets, meat puppets (that is, two people using the same Ip Address and computer), or are using a proxy located in a state that neither of them is in. I think the latter is most likely and that is something they must fix. .     Jim . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Lymantria has apologized and called it a false positive six hours before this statement, suggesting you're going against them. How the hell are we supposed to fix this when we're on two different ISPs and it's unlikely Mvcg knows what a proxy is (I know because it's my job to know but I certainly don't use proxies and know not to be on a VPN when I'm editing)? This is incredibly unhelpful and it seems like the only solution is for one of us to choose to never upload anything to Commons again because you're asserting that somehow two different people with completely different router setups in different states need to 'fix' it, for an issue that happened two months ago that was suddenly under a checkuser when nobody was vandalizing or personally attacking one another?!

I'm thankful Lymantria sincerely apologized and was neutral during their examination of the evidence, but your own stubborn insistence and telling us to 'fix' a proxy issue we have no idea how to fix has me reconsidering using Commons for any purpose. I'd rather just upload copyright-free images here from now on and let the bots move them over so I can avoid whatever 'problems' I'm not able to fix because I have no guidance here on how to avoid a one-in-a-million situation like we ended up in, and continuing to insist on a 'guilty until proven innocent' claim we are meatpuppets after another checkuser said it was a false positive?

Your lack of communication over the last four days with me and everyone else has been appalling, Jim. Instead of informing both of us, you just blocked Mvcg with a template, I received no notifications at all here or on Commons until OWaunTon got desperate to fix their own punitive block and notified me, and the fact not a byte of conversation on the RfC came from you speaks volumes, as if you shoved it off for Lymantria to resolve rather than fix on your own. I'm thankful all of us were found to be in the right. I'm mad because you were of absolutely no help in trying to resolve the situation, and my disappointment in that, and you, is going to linger for quite awhile. Nathannah • 📮 18:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

@Nathannah, you do not need to fix a proxy issue. Neither of you are on proxies. The en-wiki data is very clear and is as exonerating as it is possible for CU data to be. The corresponding Commons data was inexplicable to me, so I was relieved to hear this is a known bug with FileImporter. -- asilvering (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for helping to untangle this; I never thought making an image for a low-tier TV station transparent on a random October Friday night would have led to such a major and uncorrected bug that tangled us all in its web. Just fascinating to see now how everything worked to create this situation and I'm less mad now, more amused how Commons CU threw us all into chaos (though I'd still love to hear from Jim). Nathannah • 📮 19:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Pinging @Lymantria and Asilvering: so they are notified on this. Nathan Obral • he/him/🦝 • t • c • 20:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Also pinging @Sammi Brie: Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Let me state here that it seems that filemover has somehow created an unintentional proxy. --~2026-58891 (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

No, it's not capable of doing that as far as I am aware. We're simply looking at a bug. -- asilvering (talk) 22:38, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for you providing a deletion reasoning at WP:Articles for deletion/Hughes Bowl!

I have long believed that articles should be deleted for strong reasons of sufficient detail. Even though I created the nominated article, I am satisfied with it being deleted for a strong, detailed reason, which you helped contribute to. Cheers! — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (Goodbye!) 19:47, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Misplaced AfD nominations

It appears that the AfD nominations for Cassatella di Agira and Biscotti di San Martino by temporary account ~2026-32203-8 were misplaced at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Generation Action Network, which is an AfD that I have started for Next Generation Action Network. You have then closed those two misplaced AfD nominations under an AfD that is confusingly still open for a totally unrelated article. I have therefore removed both of those misplaced AfD nominations in Special:Diff/1333122533 to avoid the confusion that your misplaced AfD closures have caused. GTrang (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Singing Filet 'O Fish.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Singing Filet 'O Fish.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WAOW-WYOW Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WAOW-WYOW Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Noahbug2005

Would you have any qualms with me going to and reverting the changes he made under the Noahbug2005 account? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WLDB Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WLDB Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KLRT Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:KLRT Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WTIU Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WTIU Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:LPL

 Template:LPL has been nominated for merging with Template:FMXL. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

KFMB 8.2

Hello, I'm curious as to how the verification of station branding works around here... I saw that you reverted my edit on KFMB-TV relating to 8.2's branding and I'm lost as to how "MyTV San Diego" has been accepted as its brand despite there being zero real evidence that shows it as such, other than a random edit that was made with no description several weeks ago. I understand that the idea of a MyTV subchannel with a similar brand to the station's newscasts seems strange (I thought so too at first when the switch occurred..) but there is actual evidence out there (take this for example: https://www.cbs8.com/video/sports/mlb/padres/padres-fans-navigate-complicated-viewing-options-as-season-begins/509-8fd21162-a860-427f-bb54-c9475af23276) that indicates that they do indeed share brands. Since it's just station branding, I don't really see why this would need the same level of verification as a station affiliation, like the KUSI situation a few weeks ago. I'd appreciate your feedback on this because I don't really know how else this can be proven. Thanks! Waffl3coast (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you!

Got your message about the Corgi article and just wanted to say thanks for taking a look and coming back to me. GreenLeafPanda (talk) 13:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WYMS Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:WYMS Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2026 (UTC)