ENSIKLOPEDIA
Kembali ke Ensiklopedia
Arsip Wikipedia Indonesia
Talk:Tomodachi Collection
 | This article is currently a featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to leave comments. After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
 | Tomodachi Collection has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 15, 2026. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Shigeru Miyamoto told his coworkers "you guys are useless" after he received a prototype of Tomodachi Collection's character-creation system? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
Proposed merge with Tomodachi Collection: New Life
Not yet proven whether this is notable enough to have stand-alone article. Japanese Wikipedia article covers different versions in one article. Michitaro (talk) 02:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Since there are no objections, you should wp:BE BOLD and do it yourself. Transfer the contenet of Tomodachi Collection: New Life to this article and make it a wp:redirect to this. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:47, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Fix!
This article is plagued with problems. I don't think I can quote said problems, but run the article through Grammarly or something like that and see for yourself.
Namethatisnotinuse (talk) 20:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Really just reading some of it with decent knowledge of the English language will make you notice some errors haha --KoolKidz112 (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tomodachi Collection/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: TheBrickGraphic (talk · contribs) 23:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: 11WB (talk · contribs) 23:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Well-written?
Lead
- No issues here.
Gameplay
- This reads fine.
Development
- No issues here.
Release
- '
Miis debuted on the DS worldwide one year earlier in 2008
' - Minor word order change. > 'Miis debuted worldwide on the DS one year earlier in 2008
'.
Done.
Sequels
- This reads fine.
With only one minor change complete, and no other changes needed. This passes. 11WB (talk) 01:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
This criterion is passed. 11WB (talk) 01:48, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Verifiable?
- Ref 1: Unless I'm missing something, there is nothing in this source about the methods Miis can be transferred into the game?
?
- This is a partly machine-translated excerpt from the source: "
Miis can also be brought in from the Wii's "Mii Channel" or received from other players via DS wireless communication.
"
- This is a partly machine-translated excerpt from the source: "
- This seems to be right. Y
- This seems to be right.
- Ref 3: Similar issue here. This interview doesn't seem to mention the four temperaments mentioned in the prose? ?
- Iwata says this: "
Personality can be broadly divided into four categories.
" I can reword the sentence if "temperament" perhaps isn't the proper word.
- Iwata says this: "
- Courtesy ping in case this isn't seen. @TheBrickGraphic 11WB (talk) 01:55, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @11WB: It's on page 4 of the interview, titled "Observe your friends' faces and voices". TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ref 4: Ref 2 seems to confirm the text in the first two sentences of the gameplay section Y, but Ref 4 doesn't. Not sure why this has been included here? ?
- That's weird; just removed it. Y
- That's weird; just removed it.
- Ref 6: There is nothing in this source about the development team consisting of "junior employees"
N, the information about the voice synth seems to be verifiable however. 
Y
- I used "junior employees" as a paraphrase of what the article says was "
a more youthful collaborative of Nintendo staffers
" that developed the game. Would changing the wording to "younger employees" suffice?
- I used "junior employees" as a paraphrase of what the article says was "
- I see this now, this is fine. Y
- I see this now, this is fine.
- Ref 9: This more or less verifies the text, though I didn't see a specific mention on character creation being worked on for "more than a decade". Y
- The "more than a decade" claim is meant to be supported by the Nintendo World Report source that comes after this, with Ref 9 supporting the idea of Miyamoto experiencing "setbacks".
- This is fine. Y
- This is fine.
- Ref 10: No specific mention of Nakagawa working on surreal comedy, in fact his role as "Planning and Development Department" seems to be less focused on actual writing for the game itself and more about managing the team working on the game? ?
- Changed wording to "
Sakamoto cited the game's lead programmer Masanori Nakagawa as significantly influencing the game's tone.
" I removed the mention of Mai Okamoto, since it doesn't seem super important; he can remain mentioned in "Sequels".
- Changed wording to "
- Rewording looks fine. Y
- Rewording looks fine.
- Ref 11: This seems to verify the notion that game was expected not to well outside of Japan. Y
- Ref 12: Verifies the score Y, but the actual source from Famitsu would be better here (Famitsu source).
- For some reason I couldn't find this. Just included it alongside prose comments about the reviews themselves. Y
- For some reason I couldn't find this. Just included it alongside prose comments about the reviews themselves.
- Ref 16: This confirms the copies sold. Y
- Ref 21: No mention of backwards compatibility or the release date. N
- Given the mention of backwards compatibility, which only applies to the Switch 2, I assume you're referring to Ref 22? If so, the release date is mentioned ("
After one of the funniest Directs in recent memory, Nintendo announced that Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream will be arriving on Switch on 16th April,
") but the backwards compatibility isn't. Just found a TheGamer source that confirms this.Y
- Given the mention of backwards compatibility, which only applies to the Switch 2, I assume you're referring to Ref 22? If so, the release date is mentioned ("
- Isn't this being released on Switch 2 anyway? Why would backwards compatibility be relevant here, unless it is to the Switch 1? 11WB (talk) 01:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @11WB: Is the word "backwards" the issue? I guess in this case it would be "forward" compatible, since Living the Dream is a Switch 1 game that can be brought over to the Switch 2. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- It could cause minor confusion, if it is actually the reverse of what it says. If it means what you just explained, "forward-compatible" would be the appropriate, literal wording to use. 11WB (talk) 02:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Reworded it to simply say "compatible", since it's much simpler to understand and still complies with what the sources say. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- It could cause minor confusion, if it is actually the reverse of what it says. If it means what you just explained, "forward-compatible" would be the appropriate, literal wording to use. 11WB (talk) 02:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- @11WB: Is the word "backwards" the issue? I guess in this case it would be "forward" compatible, since Living the Dream is a Switch 1 game that can be brought over to the Switch 2. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:02, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Isn't this being released on Switch 2 anyway? Why would backwards compatibility be relevant here, unless it is to the Switch 1? 11WB (talk) 01:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
The sources are reliable, however there are some inconsistencies between what the sources say and what is written in the Wikipedia article. it may be going through everything quickly, and finding sources that are able to verify the information that is present. Good work otherwise! 11WB (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Everything looks to be in order now. 11WB (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
This criterion is passed. 11WB (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Broad in coverage?
The development and gameplay sections have a good amount of detail, enough that I am satisfied as a reader. The reception section is quite short, and currently lacks the score infobox. A Google search brings up reviews from websites including Gamespot, Siliconera and Kentworld (unfamiliar with the last one, but it is a Japanese source so it might be okay). 11WB (talk) 23:45, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- @11WB: I've included the Siliconera source, but the GameSpot one reads to me as a poorly written user-generated source, given that the review appears under the header "What Gamespot Users have to say about Tomodachi Collection", and the Kentworld source has the word "blog" in the URL, which looks like a red flag to me. As for the score infobox, the only review that gives a numerial rating is the four-person Famitsu source; I think having just one review in the entire table looks really weird, partly why I never added one to begin with. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, good catch. Gamespot has caught me out before with its user reviews. Are there really no other reliable reviewers that have given scores? 11WB (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I've done pretty deep digging into foreign language reviews (courtesty of user Cukie Gherkin's source searching tool), and have found nothing. It's a shame, but since the game is pretty obscure I guess it isn't too much of a surprise. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, if you've used Cukie's tool and turned up nothing, then I guess there is nothing more to be done. I would recommend Grok as a pretty decent search engine scraper, beyond that I don't know what else to recommend. On the grounds there is nothing else, I will pass this criterion. 11WB (talk) 01:47, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I've done pretty deep digging into foreign language reviews (courtesty of user Cukie Gherkin's source searching tool), and have found nothing. It's a shame, but since the game is pretty obscure I guess it isn't too much of a surprise. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, good catch. Gamespot has caught me out before with its user reviews. Are there really no other reliable reviewers that have given scores? 11WB (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
This criterion is passed. 11WB (talk) 01:47, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Neutral?
No issues here, everything is attributed and no personal opinions are given.
This criterion is passed. 11WB (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Stable?
This article has had no presence of edit warring or content disputes in recent times.
This criterion is passed. 11WB (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Well illustrated?
The Mii screenshot is placed awkwardly directly under the infobox. This can be fixed by switching the gameplay and development sections around (which I believe is the usual order anyway). 11WB (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- I understand what you're saying, but I've never seen a video game article structured in this way (Development first, then Gameplay). According to MOS:VGLAYOUT, the proper structure is Gameplay, Plot (if applicable), then Development. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:31, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
This criterion is passed. 11WB (talk) 01:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Result
- All suggestions have been implemented or given reasonable reasons as to why they shouldn't be done. I am happy to pass this. Excellent article and special thanks @TheBrickGraphic for their quick responses. 11WB (talk) 02:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
This article meets all the criteria and can be reassessed as a good article! 11WB (talk) 02:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
( )
.JPG)
Shigeru Miyamoto in 2013.
- ... that Shigeru Miyamoto (pictured) told his coworkers, "You guys are useless" after he received a prototype of Tomodachi Collection's character creation system?
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by TheBrickGraphic (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:34, 24 February 2026 (UTC).
- Hello! I'll review this Finnfrog99 (talk) 18:09, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Great work on the article! Just got upgraded to GA status and I couldnt find any missed issues. Hook is very interesting in my opinion. Finnfrog99 (talk) 18:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Finnfrog99: Thanks for reviewing! I do have one minor question though: since the hook concerns a person, do you think it could be strengthened by being attached with an image of Miyamoto himself? If so, can the hook be tweaked after the fact? TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:13, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- @TheBrickGraphic: Great idea, we can use the one that was used of Miyamoto when Donkey Kong was on the main page! 😀
- Added! TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Peer review
Tomodachi Collection
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am seeking to nominate it for FAC sometime soon. I've been researching on this somewhat-obscure game (definitely not in relation to a certain upcoming sequel) for the past few days and currently think it's not far-off from FA; any comments are appreciated.
Thanks, TheBrickGraphic (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Vacant0
Thanks for nominating this. I'll take a look at the article soon. Cheers, Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Vacant0: Gentle ping since it's been 9-10 days since the last comment here. No rush though! TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- No issues with the reliability of sources.
- Images are alright too.
- Lede okay.
- Explain what Miis are.
- Could rearranging "user-customizable Mii avatars" to "Miis, user-customizable avatars..." help in this case? Not sure how else to describe them. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Can we give any examples of minigames?
- @Vacant0: The closest I believe a source does to describe the minigames is the Nintendo Life one which says, "
Should playing cards
or watching your Miis enthusiastically headbang while performing rock music (or rap and J-Pop) somehow grow tiresome..." Playing cards is a minigame so it could be added as an example, but that, to me, is nearing on original research because the source doesn't explicity refer to cards as a minigame. What do you think? TheBrickGraphic (talk) 20:44, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Vacant0: The closest I believe a source does to describe the minigames is the Nintendo Life one which says, "
- "was young girls" was to were
- Done.
That's it from me. Yes, very short. Mostly because I did not find any errors with the prose. The article seems to be well-prepared. Expect someone to find errors at FAC though, it's very normal. Some people have better eyes than others. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 12:54, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Please ping me when you nominate this article for FAC. Cheers, Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
toby
Heyo. I remember seeing a lot of funny clips of this game's sequel, though I never played any of them myself. toby (t)(c)(rw) 20:15, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- The game was
initiallyformulated by...- Done.
Originallytitled Otona no Onna no Uranai Techō, the avatars featured in thegame'scharacter-creation system served as the progenitors for what wouldeventuallybecome the Miis.- Done.
- Following suggestions from Satoru Iwata and Shigeru Miyamoto... -> With suggestions from Satoru Iwata and Shigeru Miyamoto...
- Done.
- Tomodachi Life was
initiallyreleased in Japan in 2013.- Done.
- ...occasional guidance on prospective relationships... Is saying "occasional" necessary?
- Reading it over... I'd say it's not. Removed. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- Satisfying their needs advances their level... Link level. Per MOS:NOFORCELINK, I think there must be some way to rephrase this to explain in text what a "level" is.
- @Tarlby: I had the same idea but I was unsure how to go about this. Would saying "...their level, a numeric progression system..." suffice? I'm not sure the link you provided actually describes what a "level" is in this context; from what I can see, that article describes "level" as the stage area players move throughout, not the purely numeric kind. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks like my autopilot clicked on the wrong type of level; experience point was what I meant. I think your idea of saying "numeric progression system" works. toby (t)(c)(rw) 21:55, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for the comments! TheBrickGraphic (talk) 22:05, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks like my autopilot clicked on the wrong type of level; experience point was what I meant. I think your idea of saying "numeric progression system" works. toby (t)(c)(rw) 21:55, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Tarlby: I had the same idea but I was unsure how to go about this. Would saying "...their level, a numeric progression system..." suffice? I'm not sure the link you provided actually describes what a "level" is in this context; from what I can see, that article describes "level" as the stage area players move throughout, not the purely numeric kind. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 21:51, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
- Tomodachi Collection has no
definitiveend condition...- Done.
- Perhaps change "Initial concept" in the header to "Conception"?
- Done.
- I assume you do not need to link three-dimensional.
- Removed link.
- ...which would evolve into the Miis. -> ...which would become the Miis.
- Done.
- Development
on Otona no Onna no Uranai Techōstalled around...- Done.
- Four critics for Famitsu all commended Tomodachi Collection's humor as charming and most effective when the Miis are made in the likenesses of real-world people, though one reviewer felt the absence of a clear objective could cause Tomodachi Collection to become monotonous for some players. -> Four critics for Famitsu commended Tomodachi Collection's humor as charming and most effective when the Miis were made in the likenesses of real-world people, though one reviewer felt the absence of a clear objective could cause Tomodachi Collection to become monotonous.
- Done.
- She
alsoexpressed dismay that...- Done.
- A sequel
for the gamefor the Nintendo 3DS titled Tomodachi Collection: New Life,was...- Done.
BP!
Can you italicize game titles per MOS:TITLECAPS? 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 01:49, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Boneless Pizza!: Could you point out where specifically this is an issue? I can't find any un-italicized titles. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:57, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why you cannot see it. Ref 2 is an example. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you were referring to the prose, not the refs. I've fixed them all, but is this really a requirement for refs? I could be wrong, but I haven't seen that be in the case in many articles. Also, I don't see any mention of italics in this context in MOS:TITLECAPS? I checked the MOS for VG and didn't find anything regarding italicization in citations specificially either. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, no worries. This has been brought up multiple times at my FAC, so I would say it’s a "requirement". Doing this will also make the references look a bit better. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'll also note that for my FAC I was told italicizing the name of games in refs is required, though I don't know if this is actually said anywhere in MOS and the like. toby (t)(c)(rw) 02:44, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Interesting; that was never brought up in my previous FAC, so I wasn’t aware. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'll also note that for my FAC I was told italicizing the name of games in refs is required, though I don't know if this is actually said anywhere in MOS and the like. toby (t)(c)(rw) 02:44, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, no worries. This has been brought up multiple times at my FAC, so I would say it’s a "requirement". Doing this will also make the references look a bit better. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you were referring to the prose, not the refs. I've fixed them all, but is this really a requirement for refs? I could be wrong, but I haven't seen that be in the case in many articles. Also, I don't see any mention of italics in this context in MOS:TITLECAPS? I checked the MOS for VG and didn't find anything regarding italicization in citations specificially either. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why you cannot see it. Ref 2 is an example. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Nub098765
Hi! I have a few comments about this article:
- Lede:
- "Tomodachi Collection was followed up by..." — As far as my knowledge extends, I don't think "followed up by" is a particularly formal construction. Perhaps just "followed by"?
- Done.
- "...internationally-released sequel..." — 'Ccording to MOS:- (an amazing shortcut, by the way), hyphens shouldn't come after standard -ly adverbs.
- Huh, wasn't aware of that. Fixed TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- "Tomodachi Collection was followed up by..." — As far as my knowledge extends, I don't think "followed up by" is a particularly formal construction. Perhaps just "followed by"?
- Gameplay: "...conjures an 'ideal job'..." — "Conjures" is an odd verb for that particular mechanic. It's almost like it's thinking it up on its own, on its own volition. Funny mental image, but alas I think "determines" would be a more...unpersonificatory verb.
- Done.
- Conception and early character-creator (2005–2006):
- "to measure compatability and generate predictions about their day-to-day lives." — "Compatibility", I presume?
- Yeah. For some reason, those "-atibi" words always trip me up. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- "...but suffered design limitations and internal company pushback." — "Suffered" is a pretty strong characterization for someone trying to create a game. Perhaps "encountered" would be a more neutral verb?
- Done.
- "to measure compatability and generate predictions about their day-to-day lives." — "Compatibility", I presume?
- 'Development as Tomodachi Collection (2007–2009): "Takahashi visualized the game's new directoral framework as..." — Directorial. Stupid English adding letters where they truly do not need to be.
- Fixed. I think I actually did have "directorial" initially but changed it because I thought it was ungrammatical, lol. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Sequels: "producer Sakamato" — Isn't his name Sakamoto?
- Whoops, yeah. Fixed. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Otherwise, the prose looks clean. Great job. Seems very well researched and well put together. However, the non-free use rationale for the first image (the one of the Minecraft villager–looking Mii) is quite thin. The "purpose of use in article" reads, in full, "A screenshot from the work in question", but does not explain what about the gameplay it serves. Why use this image and not some other? Why does this image convey meaning better than a free image would?
- @Nub098765: So, for some reason, another editor (I presume a patroller, since they confirmed that the image had valid fair use rationale) removed much of what I originally wrote in the "Purpose of use in article" cel. I've re-added it because they didn't provide a clear reason for its removal in their edit summary. This is what I had initially, which I think addresses your concern: "
To demonstrate a Mii character requesting the player's assistance in remedying a problem, a core gameplay element of Tomodachi Collection.
" Essentially, answering Miis' requests is the "meat" of the tactile gameplay (hence its inclusion in the Gameplay section), since everything else is virtually al observational life-sim stuff. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- That makes more sense. Well, thank you for the explanation! Seems much better to me now. nub 🙂 03:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Overall, a great article with only a few minor issues. If this does go to FAC, please ping me and I will definitely provide a review there. Thanksya! nub 🙂 00:59, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Will do, and thanks for the kind words! TheBrickGraphic (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Olliefant =
- "by the internationally released sequel Tomodachi Life for the Nintendo 3DS in 2013." -> "a sequel, Tomodachi Life, was released in Japan for the Nintendo 3DS in 2013, and released internationally the following year" and also cut the explanatory note
- Done.
- Given its only two paragraphs, I don't think the subheadings for "Contemporary" vs "Retrospective" are needed
- Done.
- Given the lack of scores I don't think the reviewer score box is needed
- This was pretty contentious for myself; I believe the GA reviewer requested the table be added but I declined for the same reason you've brought up. Even with the added "Awards" cels, looking back I agree it's probably still not needed. I've removed it for now, though I have a hunch it'll be addressed again at FAC. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Good news for you: the review box documentation page states that it isn't even required and is not essential to the reader, so it should not bare any importance in FAC imo. toby (t)(c)(rw) 00:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, that’s good then. I really wish there was more critical discussion about this game (with scores and whatnot) beyond retrospective “wasn’t this game so quirky??” TheBrickGraphic (talk) 01:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Good news for you: the review box documentation page states that it isn't even required and is not essential to the reader, so it should not bare any importance in FAC imo. toby (t)(c)(rw) 00:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- This was pretty contentious for myself; I believe the GA reviewer requested the table be added but I declined for the same reason you've brought up. Even with the added "Awards" cels, looking back I agree it's probably still not needed. I've removed it for now, though I have a hunch it'll be addressed again at FAC. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- "The Japanese version features an exclusive mechanic" should be "featured" since the eshop is dead
- Done.
- In "Release", the bit aabout Nintendo Music feels very randomly dropped in
- @Olliefant: Do you have any other suggestions about where to put it? My only guess would be to make it its own one-sentence paragraph, but I think, in general, that's a bit frowned-upon. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Possibly "Sequals" and rename the section to "Other Media"? Olliefant (she/her) 22:52, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- I've done so but kept the word "Sequels", making the new title "Sequels and other media". I think this is apt because I'd define "other media" as non-game products relating solely to the article topic; sequels are related to the topic, yes, but they're inherently different products, being entire games themselves. TheBrickGraphic (talk) 23:02, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thats what I found Olliefant (she/her) 21:31, 28 April 2026 (UTC)