A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
Alright, this nomination has been waiting too long, lets do this. I review articles by posting a list of issues as I read through, rather than a template; I'll fix minor grammar issues myself rather than call them out.
"which included additional stages and new features via OpenFeint integration" - should explain a little bit what OpenFeint is/was rather than relying solely on the link
"Following a digital release on consoles, word of the announcement spread to Western regions; the iPad version, titled Space Invaders Infinity Gene HD, was anticipated to release before the end of the year.[37] Soon after, the iPad version released in 2010." - no point having a sentence about the game being anticipated to be released, immediately followed by it being released
"Infinity Gene would temporarily go on sale in the App Store in December 2011 and again a year later." - given that the article (as per normal) does not discuss prices, I don't think the game having a sale should be in the article. Same thing in the Android paragraph.
"In February 2011, the publisher announced a second album titled Space Invaders Infinity Gene –Evolutional Theory– that would release at the end of March.[53] The soundtrack was delayed a few weeks until April 13, 2011." - there's no need, 15 years later, to talk about release date announcements rather than just releases, especially when the delay was only 2 weeks.
"Rumors appeared online..." Again, no need to discuss rumors and speculation, especially not immediately prior to what actually happened being stated
No source issues found, though if a reference does not have an author, it's not recommended to use "Staff", but to instead leave it blank (per Help:Citation Style 1)
That's it, there wasn't much to comment on, it's a nicely written article. If you intend to go to FAC later, I'd recommend a copyedit pass for concision and some awkward phrasing (using "the company" or "the director" to avoid saying Taito/Ishida or it/he reads oddly sometimes), but that's about it. Placing on hold for now. --PresN 17:38, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback and the fixes you made. I believe I addressed your concerns above. I kept the "Staff" in the citations because no author changes the order of the citation information. If it's not a hard rule, I'd rather keep the formatting consistent. Although I will do a deeper dive of the web sources without an author to see if I can find an editor-in-chief to list.
Regarding Featured status, I appreciate the help. If it has a chance at FAC, I may put it up for peer review to fine tune the prose. (Guyinblack25talk 19:39, 29 April 2026 (UTC))
Alright, passing for GA. --PresN 19:54, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it has FA potential. I'm focusing on the quality of the prose but am open to feedback on all aspects to ensure the article has a good chance at FAC. Thanks, (Guyinblack25talk 02:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC))
