This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
Country?
How is the country Canada if they don't have any presence there? Everett3 (talk) 01:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
I've clarified this in the article. - Samuel Wiki (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Content on Animal Welfare added to pressurize the business
Dear Admin,
I request the removal of the content under the "Animal Welfare" section, as it has been added with the intent to misrepresent the brand and pressure the business through misleading claims. This content is not factual and serves to tarnish the brand's reputation.
Thank you for your assistance. Sivasdad (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Done. That reeked of undue weight. AtlasDuane (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
On Undue Weight
I would like to tell people currently embroiled in an edit war, that wikipedia prefers a Neutral point of view. Over half the article's content is about why the business is terrible, which isn't a good article. AtlasDuane (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
I actually think creating a separate article for the criticism makes the POV problem worse, because if that article is just titled "criticism", then only criticism can be put into that article. ―Panamitsu(talk) 22:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)