Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ssial.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Murdered father

There is an unsubstantiated claim that he (supposedly Mansa Muss) murdered his father. Is this accurate and if so, is there a reference? Aholver93 (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The Tarikh al-Fattash claims Musa killed his own mother, and the historian Michael Gomez suggests that there may have been palace intrigues involved in Musa's accession in his book African Dominion. I'm not aware of any claims that he killed his own father. Ornithopsis (talk) 09:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Etymology of Musa

The Arabic name Musa means "Moses" and a Mandinka dictionary released by the Gambian Peace Corps says the Mandinka name Musaa means "Moses". As such, it seems reasonable to infer that Musa's name can be said to mean "Moses". However, no reliable source I am aware of actually makes the connection—for all I know, the similarity is coincidental. If anybody could find a source for the etymology of Musa's name, it would probably be worth including in the article. Ornithopsis (talk) 09:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

How Manda Musa maintained his power?? 41.115.2.45 (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Majority of Muslims in the world is named after the 25 prophets, included Ya'qub(Jacob), Ibrahim(Abraham), Adam, and especially Muhammad. So, if there is one named Musa, then it is very common like the other names. MahmoudAbbasAlDilfti (talk) 06:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

jeliw

Not sure what "jeliw" in the article means. Is that a typo of "jealous people"? 92.6.237.83 (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

It's a typo. According to the cited source, it should be jelis, another name for Griot - a keeper and reciter of oral historical traditions. Have fixed and explained the term. Thanks for catching the error. Haploidavey (talk) 10:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

It's not a typo. Jeliw is the Manding plural of jeli, so the spelling was deliberate. In scholarly literature, it seems to be slightly more common to pluralize jeli as jeliw than as jelis, but I recognize that the way I originally wrote it would be confusing to many readers. Ornithopsis (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah. So anyway, I've just followed the cited source, who may well have been as ignorant as I am of Manding grammar. It's good to learn these things. Haploidavey (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

To give some idea of relative popularity of the spellings, on Google Scholar, "jeliw mali" provides 494 results and "jelis mali" provides 302 results, and "jeliw griot" provides 421 results and "jelis griot" provides 146 results. As such, I've restored the use of the Manding plural, but explained jeliw earlier and hopefully have rephrased things to be clearer.Ornithopsis (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

That's much clearer (it's always a good idea to give singular and plural forms). Nice work. Haploidavey (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

How to frame Musa's wealth

I think it's important to mention Musa's wealth in the lede, as he is world-famous as the wealthiest person ever (regardless of whether that claim is accurate). If you google "wealthiest person ever", close to half the results are about Mansa Musa, and if you google "mansa musa", about half the results call him the wealthiest person ever. I think it would be remiss not to address the most famous thing about Musa in the lede of the article. However, as has been discussed above, there are not adequate sources to support the extraordinary claim that he was actually the wealthiest person ever—and indeed it's reasonable to assume that rulers of larger and more powerful empires (such as the Achaemenid, Roman, Mughal, and Chinese empires) could have commanded greater wealth, albeit not necessarily in the form of an equal quantity of pure gold. However, there is a lack of reliable sources, as far as I am aware, that provide a rigorous evaluation of his wealth. Following Wikipedia's policy on verifiability best as possible, what I put in the lede was He has often been called the wealthiest person in history, though his wealth is impossible to accurately quantify and it is difficult to meaningfully compare the wealth of historical figures. This statement is backed up by some of the sources cited in the section on his wealth. However, the other day, an IP user removed these sentences from the lede. I would like to add those sentences back to the lede, but I am open for alternatives on how to address this situation. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Seriously, does anyone have any idea of how to address the thing Musa is most famous for in the lede of the article other than saying nothing at all? I figured the sentence that I wrote in the lede was a neutral enough statement, but Yeeno removed it for being POV (after I had restored it after an IP user removed it without much of an explanation). Ornithopsis (talk) 05:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

@Ornithopsis: I don't think there's anything wrong with your statement, sorry for removing it. I had just done the revert to get rid of the IP's POV editing. It should be okay to put in the lead, since it's supported by sources in the body. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 06:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

You really left your stamp here to spread the mansa musa propaganda from google to Wikipedia. I get that it’s important to spread the myth of Mali having huge amounts of wealth back then but there were probably European dukes with more wealth, and likely kings with more pure gold, if you can look past the made up and untreated to accounts of his wealth. Not only that but the archeological and historical confirmed record is noticeably empty of this gold for a clear reason…it never existed Chachaagain (talk) 04:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

It would be nice if Wikipedia followed its own guidelines and cited a few renowned historians who support the claims about Mansa Musa’s wealth. In reality, it appears to be a comic-like myth, similar to Wakanda. This all falls into the trend of Afrocentric pseudohistory. Another identical case is the claim that Stone Henge was build by Sub-Saharan Africans. Hunig Brocc (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

I’ve been searching online where most of the world’s gold came from in the Middle Ages and I see figures like 60% from west Africa. If anyone can find a better source

“A History Of Gold In The Middle Ages” By Brian D. Colwell

”West African Gold and Trans-Saharan Trade (1100–1500)

While Europeans fought over Eastern Mediterranean gold, the most important source of medieval gold lay in West Africa. During the 12th century, approximately 60% of gold circulating in Europe originated from West African sources, transported north across the Sahara through trading centers like Sijilmasa. The empires of Mali and Ghana controlled crucial gold-producing regions in Bambuk and Bure.” Markj573 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

This is from the World History Encyclopedia. About as credible source as you can get “The Gold Trade of Ancient & Medieval West Africa” by Mark Cartwright

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1383/the-gold-trade-of-ancient--medieval-west-africa/

“This they did with great success and, at the trade's peak, two-thirds of the gold moving around the medieval Mediterranean came from West Africa” Markj573 (talk) 00:27, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Of birth years and rap battles

Regarding two recent edit debates on this page: First, the year of his birth. The page currently says Musa was born c. 1280, but I'm not sure where that claim comes from. Gomez (2018) guesses that Musa would have been around 35 in 1324, based on the fact that he was presumably an adult when he acceded to the throne in 1312 (or 1307) and still appeared to be a young man in 1324. This is, however, only a guess. Unless someone can find a source supporting the 1280 date, we should probably do something different with the dates—I'm not sure if we can state the date of his birth any more precisely than "late 13th century". As far as Epic Rap Battles of History is concerned, poorly-sourced and indiscriminate "in popular culture" sections are precisely why such sections have a bad name—if somebody can find an adequate secondary source supporting the notability of the Epic Rap Battles of History episode, I'd be all for including it in the article, but on principle, only citing the video itself is bad practice. Ornithopsis (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

ok 41.121.123.35 (talk) 20:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Musa Keita?

None of the scholarly sources I have read call Mansa Musa "Musa Keita" at any point. "Musa Keita" turns up a handful of Google Scholar results, mostly of dubious veracity (several appear to be sourced from Wikipedia itself). As such, I am unconvinced that Musa is actually called "Musa Keita". Indeed, in general, reliable sources giving a clear sense of how the name Keita connects to the historical rulers of Mali seem rather sparse, though obviously they are regarded as Keitas in some sense. I have removed the references to Musa Keita from the article; I think we need a better source to back up use of the name. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Mansa musa

All about mansa musa 94.174.44.127 (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

A lot of this history is legend

Given that the value of gold being described is around 9 trillion USDollars. 60,000 men in his entourage would have been more than the population of Cairo! The logistics of feeding and watering them (most of the journey being across desert) would have been slightly difficult. Sources quoted from the time were obviously exagerated for his agrandissement. Why can't Wikipedia editors recognise this instead of feeding us fairystories? Francis Hannaway (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Francish7 I’m skeptical myself, but have no sources challenging this. Do you? Doug Weller talk 18:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Whether or not there are sources, it can still be included that sources are not reliable from that era. It's like reporting on the Exodus as historical fact. Wikipedia has to be more than repeating bad history reports. Francis Hannaway (talk) 19:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

We’ve loads of sources saying the Exodus isn’t fact. What sources do we have about the sources in question? Doug Weller talk 19:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Bear in mind that Exodus was written down by people centuries after the fact, whereas the most detailed account of Mansa Musa's pilgrimage (that of al-Umari) was written down only twelve years later based on eyewitness accounts. In fact, we have one direct eyewitness account written down by someone who personally saw Mansa Musa in Mecca! Regarding your claims of implausibility: Gold is currently worth USD$1,840 per ounce. It is claimed that Musa brought approximately 18 tons of gold (525,000 oz) on his pilgrimage. That's roughly a billion dollars worth of gold. Islamic Cairo states that the population of Cairo during the reign of al-Nasir Muhammad (i.e. at the time of Musa's pilgrimage) has been claimed to have been roughly 500,000. There is, admittedly, a detail currently overlooked in the article regarding the size of Musa's entourage; 60,000 is the number he's claimed to have left Mali with in the Tarikh al-Sudan, not the number he arrived in Cairo with. Many of his entourage fell ill en route and did not travel further than Tuat; he seems to have arrived in Cairo with closer to 10,000–20,000 people. So no, it is not being claimed that Musa arrived in Cairo with nine trillion dollars in gold and an entourage larger than the entire population of Cairo. While it's certainly true that there's a lot of room for improvement in the quality of Wikipedia's coverage of Musa and the Mali Empire—improvement I have dedicated a good deal of my free time to working on—if you're going to criticize this article for factual inaccuracies, at least try to be factually accurate yourself. Ornithopsis (talk) 19:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Bear in mind that both are oral retelling decades after the fact. Mansa Midas story was written down by very few people and mostly with self interest in telling a grand story. We have one hearsay evidence who remembered seeing him in Mecca. WOW. It is claimed he brought should just stop you in your tracks. If you honestly believe the numbers you’re delusional. Much like historical armies and historical numbers the historicity is dubious at best and flat out never happened at worst. Chachaagain (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

That comment is over 3 years old, and you are being a bit insulting to say the least. I see you've responded elsewhere also. Please note this talk page is only to discuss the article, not Mansa Musa, and show how you want the article changed. You'll probably need sources. Doug Weller talk 09:32, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Typo in Legacy: Wealth section

"Musa Musa" instead of "Mansa Musa". Can't edit because locked. 2600:6C44:F7F:FD8F:D5DD:2CE7:3:5D54 (talk) 03:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)\

Thanks very much, fixed. Doug Weller talk 10:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

As fake as Solomon

I have my doubts that Mansa Musa ever existed. There’s no artifacts of his empire and the earliest records are relatively recent Islamic “scholar” references, which brings me to my next point: I believe Mansa Musa’s story exists to try and one up the Jewish story of King Solomon. The details are similar: greatest wealth and greatest wisdom. There’s also no artifacts of Solomon’s empire. Shame on Smithsonian Mag for publishing their “article” on Mansa Musa. I wasn’t able to find any good support for any of the stuff they wrote. 173.79.150.89 (talk) 14:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Numerous Arabic sources written within several years of Musa's pilgrimage exist. Al-Umari interviewed people who had met Musa and Al-Yafii apparently saw him personally. Ibn Battuta traveled to Mali during the reign of Musa's brother Sulayman. Buildings in Gao and Timbuktu may date, at least partially, to Musa's reign, and the archaeological site of Sorotomo was a major town in Musa's time that shows evidence of being a place of imperial authority. When the Portuguese explored the coasts of Africa, a couple centuries after Musa's time, they learned from the coastal peoples they met that inland a great empire was ruled by the Mandi Mansa ("Mandi" and "Mali" are different pronunciations of the same word in various languages of West Africa). It's true that both the archaeological and documentary record leave a lot of gaps in our knowledge of Musa's reign, but his existence and having brought a lot of gold on his hajj are about as well-documented as you can expect of the Middle Ages. Ornithopsis (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

How rich is he 2603:9001:4D06:6927:1165:D62C:9964:1238 (talk) 03:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

You really are ignoring the elephant in the room though. Al-umari is describing stories he heard second hand years after they happened. 18-25 in the current consensus. Historical chronicles of battles will greatly exaggerate the number of fighters a month after the battle, now imagine recording a convoy and gold brought 25 years after the event. There’s just no real basis. Similarly for Battuta, if he was even real, never points to much of the supreme wealth Mali to look like never mind its in the reign of his brother. Similar to stories of El Dorado told by costal Muisca, it’s quite possible that costal Africans listened to the same stories. A land of gold inland where vast fortunes existed.

The most likely answer is it’s a tall tale, a myth. We have no artifacts, no evidence, and some stories of dubious to fantasy credibility. Maybe he was a well off king, probably he brought a modest amount of gold for his hajj, most likely everyone exaggerated the wealth because it was the thing to do, harmless but importance adding to an otherwise footnote event. Ultimately he doesn’t even approach a list of the richest of all time. Chachaagain (talk) 04:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

I also have a very serious doubt about the existence of this man. But let's assume he did exist. The insurmountable issue as I see it (shocking no one pointed it out here) is how can he be judged the wealthiest man ever when no monetary system existed in 14th century Sub Saharan Africa? There were no minted coins, no manufacturing of any kind, no concept of metallurgy, no system of writing, hence, no ledgers and no way to record anything. The wheel didn't even exist in Sub Saharan Africa at that time, meaning any significant amount of trading would be impossible. And just what could a 'wealthy' person purchase in 14th century Sub Saharan Africa? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:62F0:6F40:7822:9100:FDDF:4F57 (talk) 23:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

ninth or tenth

hello,

there is an incoherence between english wikipedia (ninth mansa) and the french (10th mansa). I also checked : german (no mention), italian (9), esperanto (10)... I'm fairly new in the editing side of wikipedia. How do we rule which is correct ? Midi13 (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

We don't control what the French Wikipedia does, and vice versa. What you would do is make sure our article reflects what the sources cited say, and that those sources are reliable. Remsense ‥ 论 18:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

The confusion is because of a 19th-century mistranslation that led to historians incorrectly inserting a nonexistent mansa between Mansa Muhammad and Mansa Musa. The cited Levtzion article provides more detail: "Another fallacy that follows from De Slane's mistranslation is that Abu Bakr himself reigned in Mali. Thus all the commentators put in their genealogical tables 'Abu-Bakr II'. But the Arabic text makes it clear that Mansa Musa was the first ruler of the new branch of the ruling dynasty, and that Abu-Bakr had not been king." Musa is specifically numbered the 9th Mansa of Mali on page 353. The French and Esperanto wiki pages are probably based on outdated sources that still include "Abu Bakr II" in the list of mansas. Ornithopsis (talk) 02:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

typo?

in Later reign, paragraph two, first sentence. "a building communicating by an interior door" is the word "communicating" a typo? It doesn't make sense in that sentence to me. Cherrytif (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

I've just deleted the paragraph in question, which has been uncited since its addition in 2007, and is unclear both in what it is describing and its ultimate importance in the article. Remsense ‥ 论 07:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Wrong 24.158.205.105 (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 May 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Appearance “A young handsome man.” and “[a] young man, brown skinned, with a pleasant face and handsome appearance”

He was a young man with a brown skin, a pleasant face and good figure…His gifts amazed the eye with their beauty and splendour.

(quoted in Zerbo, 59) https://www.worldhistory.org/Mansa_Musa_I/

https://hauda.org/2018/09/27/africa-before-trouble-start/

https://www.royaltynowstudios.com/blog/blog-post-title-two-egyff? Themandinkawarrior (talk) 13:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

You need to propose a _specific_ change. What text should be added, and where?

(Beyond that, on the face of it I don't think these three links - all of which come down to that Al-Makrizi allegedly wrote that about him about a century after he was a young man - merit inclusion of anything.) 81.187.237.192 (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Edit for clarity in the overview section

Here's the sentence I find problematic: 'Musa was exceptionally wealthy,[6] to an extent that contemporaries described him as inconceivably rich; Time magazine reported: "There's really no way to put an accurate number on his wealth."[7]'

This both (1) suggests that Time was one of Musa's contemporaries and (2) is a somewhat misleading summary of the content of the Time article cited. Also, (3) I think it's inappropriate to emphasise - however incidentally - that the citation is from Time; he's a historical figure, not a modern-day celebrity.

The parts of the Time article I think this is summarising read as follows: "Just how rich was Musa? There's really no way to put an accurate number on his wealth. Records are scarce, if non-existent, and contemporary sources describe the king's riches in terms that are impossible for this time. [...] But to get caught up in the king's exact wealth is to miss the point. As Rudolph Ware, an associate professor at the University of Michigan, explains, Musa's riches were so immense that people struggled to describe them."

I'd suggest something along the lines of: 'Musa was exceptionally wealthy.[6] It is hard to estimate precisely how wealthy he was, as the amounts suggested by contemporary sources are impossible; but this can itself be taken as evidence for the overwhelming nature of his wealth.[7]' 49.130.189.56 (talk) 07:39, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Massa Musa

Where was the ancient kingdom of Mali in what years did most most go there? 24.158.205.105 (talk) 14:28, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

One could click on Mali Empire in the first sentence of the article to learn more. —Tamfang (talk) 00:00, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Revert unexplained removal

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

• What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mansa_Musa&diff=prev&oldid=1303337154 removes the word "the" before "Mali Empire". This should be reverted.

(In "please change X to Y"; please change "was the title of the ruler of Mali Empire" back to "was the title of the ruler of the Mali Empire".)

• Why it should be changed:

It appears to be a simple error (leaving behind a double space). The Mali Empire is usually referred to as, well, "the Mali Empire".

81.187.237.192 (talk) 04:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

 Done Day Creature (talk) 14:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Sentence not needed in lede

although he features less in Mandinka oral traditions than his predecessors.. I am not sure what is special about that clause that requires it so high in the lead. How he is featured elsewhere is not that notable, especially when you look at the state of those pages and how poor they are. It gives an undue weight to the significance of a subjective statement. Inayity (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2026

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I request for where it says "Ruler of Mali from c. 1312 to c. 1337" in the short description to be changed to "Emperor of Mali from c. 1312 to c. 1337", please. ~2026-23812-69 (talk) 20:40, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. In this case, reliable sources that state that Musa's title was "Emperor". Day Creature (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

"Mansa" means "king of kings" or "emperor". ~2026-23913-44 (talk) 16:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you have a source for that? Day Creature (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Error in Consturction in Mali

I can't change the error myself but I would like to recommend changing the invalid hyperlink at ""Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization" into ""Thus was laid the foundation of an urban civilization (Urbanization)" to allow a hyperlink to exist ~2026-24358-83 (talk) 14:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2026

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I request for where it says "Ruler of Mali from c. 1312 to c. 1337" in the short description to be changed to "Mansa of Mali from c. 1312 to c. 1337" please. ~2026-24371-81 (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: As many readers may not be familiar with the term "mansa", it's better to use the generic term "ruler" in the short description. Day Creature (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Mansa Musa’s real wealth, the import of copper

The wealth section (under legacy) of the article does a good job showing we can’t calculate Mansa Musa’s wealth. Valuing gold at current prices would mean a man in the 14th century wealth would fluctuate randomly with current gold prices which would be nonsensical. Salt and copper was expensive in the Mali empire and today’s value of those commodities would be irrelevant when considering 14th century Mali economy. One factor making those commodities expensive was the super abundance (and cheapness) of gold. The vast gold trade only happened because it was taking it away from a region where it was abundant to where it was scarce.

If we take things from the point of view of the region we could say that Mansa Musa was incredibly rich because of the import of vast amounts of copper. Markj573 (talk) 12:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Source-critical revisions per Schultz, Collet, Hunwick, Prussin, McIntosh

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Mansa Musa. (edit · history · last · links · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{subst:ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

I propose five source-critical revisions to the article, all grounded in academic sources (Schultz 2006, Hunwick 1990, Collet 2019, Fauvelle 2018 — already in the article's reference list — plus Prussin 1986, McIntosh & McIntosh 1980, and Collet 2022 to be added). The current article asserts as fact several quantitative claims that the cited modern scholarship does not actually support and in some cases explicitly contradicts (notably Schultz on the dirham/mithqal fluctuation and Hunwick on the al-Sāḥilī attribution). Existing references are preserved; one WP:CALC dollar-conversion is removed.

Change 1 (§Historical sources): ADD a paragraph

After the paragraph ending "...with his predecessor conquerors receiving more prominence.^[1]", and before the "==Lineage==" header, add this paragraph:

The four principal Arabic-language sources for Musa's reign — al-Umari (whose sections on Mali and on Egypt were composed c. 1337–1338, more than a decade after the hajj), Ibn Khaldun (whose Muqaddimah was completed in 1377 and whose broader Kitāb al-ʿIbar was finalised c. 1382–1383, roughly half a century after Musa's death), Ibn Battuta (who visited Mali during the subsequent reign of Musa's brother Sulayman in 1352–1353), and Leo Africanus (whose Description of Africa was completed in Rome in 1526, after the empire had entered its decline) — were all composed at substantial temporal remove from the events they describe, and rely in part on second- or third-hand testimony transmitted through Mamluk court circles in Cairo. None of these authors visited Mali during Musa's reign. Modern scholarship therefore treats their quantitative claims — particularly figures for retinue size, gold transported, and gifts distributed — as primarily rhetorical, intended to convey the unprecedented impression Musa's hajj produced on contemporary audiences rather than to record audited inventories.^[2][3][4] The historian Hadrien Collet, in the first French-language monograph devoted to the Mali sultanate since 1977, has examined the layered fabrication of the Mansa Musa myth across the colonial, postcolonial, and contemporary periods and argues that much of what is taken as factual about the hajj reflects centuries of accumulated retelling rather than recoverable historical record.^[4][5]

Change 2 (§Pilgrimage to Mecca): REPLACE retinue and camels passage

Change FROM:

His procession reportedly included upwards of 12,000 slaves, all wearing brocade and Yemeni silk^[6] and each carrying 1.8 kg (4 lb) of gold bars, with heralds dressed in silks bearing gold staffs organizing horses and handling bags.^{[citation needed]}

Musa provided all necessities for the procession, feeding the entire company of men and animals.^[7] Those animals included 80 camels, which each carried 23–136 kg (50–300 lb) of gold dust. Musa gave the gold to the poor he met along his route. Musa not only gave to the cities he passed on the way to Mecca, including Cairo and Medina, but also traded gold for souvenirs. It was reported that he built a mosque every Friday.^[8] Shihab al-Din al-'Umari, who visited Cairo shortly after Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca, noted that it was "a lavish display of power, wealth, and unprecedented by its size and pageantry".^[9] Musa made a major point of showing off his nation's wealth.

Change TO:

Arabic chroniclers writing after the event give widely varying figures for the size of Musa's caravan and the quantity of gold it transported, and modern historians treat these numbers as rhetorical rather than statistical.^[2][3] According to figures preserved in the later Arabic accounts, his procession included upwards of 12,000 slaves, all wearing brocade and Yemeni silk^[6] and each said to have carried 1.8 kg (4 lb) of gold bars, with heralds dressed in silks bearing gold staffs organizing horses and handling bags.^{[citation needed]}

Musa is reported to have provided all necessities for the procession, feeding the entire company of men and animals.^[7] The same sources state that the caravan included 80 camels, each said to have carried between 23–136 kg (50–300 lb) of gold dust — a range that itself reflects the absence of any audited contemporary count and is treated by modern historians as an upper-bound literary topos rather than a measurement.^[2][3] Musa is said to have distributed gold to the poor along his route and to the cities he passed through on the way to Mecca, including Cairo and Medina, and reportedly to have built a mosque every Friday.^[8] Shihab al-Din al-'Umari, who visited Cairo shortly after the pilgrimage and is the proximate source for most of these accounts, described the procession as "a lavish display of power, wealth, and unprecedented by its size and pageantry".^[10]

Change 3 (§Wealth): REPLACE inflation and 18-tons passage; remove WP:CALC dollar gloss

Change FROM:

According to some Arabic writers, Musa's gift-giving caused a depreciation in the value of gold in Egypt. Al-Umari said that before Musa's arrival a mithqal of gold was worth 25 silver dirhams, but that it dropped to less than 22 dirhams afterward and did not go above that number for at least twelve years.^[11] Though this has been described as having "wrecked" Egypt's economy,^[12] the historian Warren Schultz has argued that this was well within normal fluctuations in the value of gold in Mamluk Egypt.^[2] Musa may have taken as much as 18 tons of gold on his hajj,^[13] equal in value to over US$1.397 billion in 2024.^[14]

Change TO:

The most widely repeated economic claim attached to Musa's pilgrimage — that his distribution of gold in Cairo collapsed the value of Egyptian currency for a decade or more — derives from a single passage in al-Umari, who wrote that before Musa's arrival a mithqal of gold traded at 25 silver dirhams, dropping to under 22 dirhams afterward and not recovering for at least twelve years.^[11] Though this episode has been described in popular accounts as having "wrecked" Egypt's economy,^[12] the numismatic historian Warren C. Schultz has reassessed the claim against the surviving Mamluk exchange-rate record and concluded that it does not withstand scrutiny: only one Mamluk source — al-Umari himself — attributes a sustained drop in the value of gold to Musa's pilgrimage, and the dirham–mithqal fluctuation he describes (from roughly 25:1 to 20:1) falls well within the range of short-term exchange-rate movements documented across the first half of the fourteenth century. Schultz observes, for example, that in 1300 the silver-to-gold ratio in Cairo had already fallen from approximately 25.5:1 to 17:1 — a sharper movement than the 1324 episode — illustrating that the Mamluk exchange rate was perennially volatile for reasons unconnected to Musa's gold.^[2] The framing of Musa's hajj as the cause of a decade-long Egyptian inflation, popularised in twentieth- and twenty-first-century world-history textbooks and online media, is not supported by the underlying Mamluk numismatic evidence.^[2][4][5]

Estimates that Musa brought as much as 18 tons of gold on his hajj — figures sometimes glossed in modern media as equivalent to billions of US dollars — are reconstructions extrapolated from the same al-Umari and Ibn Khaldun reportage, and reflect a single chain of transmission rather than independent attestation.^[13][2][15] The conversion of such figures into modern monetary equivalents is regarded by historians as methodologically unsound, given both the gap between fourteenth-century Sahelian gold-economy logic and modern asset valuation and the difficulty of separating the personal wealth of a monarch from that of the state.^[15][16]

Change 4 (§Economy and education): REPLACE al-Sāḥilī sentence

Change FROM:

He brought architects from Andalusia, a region in Spain, and Cairo to build his grand palace in Timbuktu and the great Djinguereber Mosque that still stands.^[17]

Change TO:

According to a long-standing tradition in nineteenth- and twentieth-century historiography, Musa brought architects from Andalusia and Cairo to build his palace in Timbuktu and the great Djinguereber Mosque that still stands, with the Granadan poet Abū Isḥāq al-Sāḥilī commonly credited as the principal designer.^[17] Subsequent scholarship has substantially qualified this attribution. J. O. Hunwick has shown that the only project firmly attributable to al-Sāḥilī in the Arabic sources is a royal audience chamber at the city of Mali — for which Ibn Khaldun records a payment of 12,000 mithqals of gold (approximately 51 kg) — and that al-Sāḥilī's role there appears to have been decorative and organisational rather than that of a structural architect.^[18] On the broader Sudano-Sahelian tradition, the architectural historian Labelle Prussin has argued that the earthen (banco) architecture of the Niger bend, with its projecting toron beams, represents a centuries-long synthesis of indigenous West African and Islamic design practices rather than an importation from al-Andalus or the Maghreb;^[19] modern scholarship accordingly regards the image of al-Sāḥilī as the founder of West African mosque architecture as a historiographical myth rather than an established historical fact.^[19][18] Excavations at Djenné-Djenno by Susan and Roderick McIntosh have established that permanent settlement, complex craft production and iron metallurgy were already present in the Inland Niger Delta by the third century BCE — with long-distance exchange networks attested in subsequent phases of the site — demonstrating that the architectural and urban infrastructure on which Musa's building programme drew was an indigenous tradition of substantial antiquity rather than an importation of his reign.^[20]

Change 5 (Bibliography "Other sources"): ADD three entries

Insert each at the alphabetical position indicated:

After the existing "Collet 2019" entry, add:

• Collet, Hadrien (2022). Le sultanat du Mali. Histoire régressive d'un empire médiéval (XXIe–XIVe siècle) (in French). Paris: CNRS Éditions. ISBN 978-2-271-13979-5.

After the existing "MacBrair 1873" entry and before "McKissack 1994", add:

• McIntosh, Susan Keech; McIntosh, Roderick J. (1980). Prehistoric Investigations in the Region of Jenne, Mali: A Study in the Development of Urbanism in the Sahel. Cambridge Monographs in African Archaeology 2, BAR International Series 89. Vol. 2 vols. Oxford: B.A.R.

After the existing "Niane 1984" entry and before "Sapong 2016", add:

• Prussin, Labelle (1986). Hatumere: Islamic Design in West Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-03004-4.

Note to reviewing editor

If a piecemeal implementation is preferred, the lowest-risk changes are #1 (a contextualising paragraph that adds rather than removes) and #4 (Hunwick is already cited elsewhere in the article; this change brings the body in line with the existing citation). The full revised wikitext is available on request. Schultz 2006 is already cited in §Wealth as a subordinate clause — change #3 expands that existing citation with the specific numismatic evidence Schultz provides. FABIO INVERARDI (talk) 12:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

I was going to institute the edits but decided someone more competent should because I’ll probably screw up the footnotes.

Contemporary to Mansa Musa there would be great Native American gold hoards like the Chimu empire and later empires before the conquistadors came. Their gold hoards might be similar or larger than Mansa Musa’s gold holdings. The Songhai empire came later and was larger than the Malian one, their gold holdings might have been even bigger until the Portuguese circumnavigated their monopoly of the gold trade.

Btw gold went down 2.34% before markets closed yesterday so Mansa Musa’s wealth went down by exactly that amount

Edit: I implemented a bunch of the changes and cut a bit to make it more brief. I don't think there should be any problem with it. This is really well researched and I'm glad to see more debunking the overexaggerated amount of gold he supposedly had on the Hadj and more information about the indigenous architecture. Great job Markj573 (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)