This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Apple Developer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
I think I have adequately expanded the article, and so I have removed the expansion notice. TDS (talk • contribs) 04:06, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Isn't this more of an advertisement for Apple Developer Connnection? Current Information on this topic is available from Apple's own website (which in my opinion should be the source for this information).
I think that this notice should be added again. As you can see, the article is considerably small now. --Pauldunahoo (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Assessment
Could be "B" class, however lacks independent reviews, value for money, comparison between other developer programmes and criticism (if any). Nja247 (talk • contribs) 09:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement
I've readded the advert tag. I think the "Benefits" section needs to be rewritten; as it stands, it seems almost verbatim from the ADC site. A criticism section would be good, too, but I'm not sure how much in the way of independent reviews is available. bou·le·var·dier (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Membership types
The membership types are no longer applicable: Now there are only two options: Mc Developer or iOS Developer, each for $99 / year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.128.31.9 (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
I updated the article a lot, but it still needs a little bit more work. AriX (talk) 00:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Now there is only one type of membership as the iOS and Mac Developer programs were merged. Nathan Osman (talk) 06:03, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I have added the template because the article's tone seems quite informal compared to most articles. I will help to try to improve the tone, and will remove the template if the problem is resolved. 1980fast (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
