In terms of specific policies, being a "Roosevelt Republican" has been described as supporting the conservation movement and having sympathies for environmentalist measures aimed at protecting natural landscapes. This frequently entails an emphasis on hunting and fishing along with wildlife tourism under the backdrop of government ownership of certain areas, with a particularly limited room for more invasive uses of public areas such as mining. Administrative efforts in cleaning up locations after coal extraction and other intensive uses of various lands to restore previous appearances have importance as well. This all contrasts with the Republican Party's traditional focus on privatization to encourage corporate ownership of former public locations as well as related policies aiming to radically convert more areas from a natural status to one of industrial economic development.[1]
Former U.S. Congressman and present Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, has referred to himself as a "Teddy Roosevelt conservationist".[4] This labeling has attracted public criticism from news agencies such as the Orlando Weekly as well as from non-profit organizations focusing on conservation such as the League of Conservation Voters (LCV).[5][4] His voting record as a member of the House of Representatives indicates very little support for policies supported by environmentalists, earning him a ranking of 2% (out of a possible 100%) by the LCV.[5] DeSantis has denied the scientific realities around climate change, asserting that the sea level rise may or may not be "because of human activity".[4]
Another self-described "Roosevelt Republican" is Ryan Zinke,[1] a Montana politician and U.S. Navy veteran who became the 52nd U.S. Secretary of Interior on March 1, 2017.[6] However, during his tenure as Secretary of the Interior, Zinke oversaw an aggressive expansion of industrial activity on public lands, including fast-tracking environmental reviews for oil and gas drilling[7] to increase the number of permits, proposing offshore oil drilling[8] on both the east and west coasts (an act that was opposed by governors of all 15 coastal states[9]), and the nation's first-ever reductions in the boundaries of national monuments[10] to favor utilization of the land by private companies involved in the oil and gas industry.