↑étrangères, Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires. "Présentation des États-Unis". France Diplomatie:: Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires étrangères. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal January 25, 2022. Diakses tanggal January 25, 2022.
12Luis Lug; Sandra Stencel; John Green; Gregory Smith; Dan Cox; Allison Pond; Tracy Miller; Elixabeth Podrebarac; Michelle Ralston (February 2008). "U.S. Religious Landscape Survey"(PDF). Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Pew Research Center. Diarsipkan(PDF) dari versi aslinya tanggal July 5, 2013. Diakses tanggal February 12, 2012.
"Fernandez v. Keisler, 502 F.3d 337". Fourth Circuit. September 26, 2007. hlm.341. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal August 30, 2021. Diakses tanggal June 8, 2021. The INA defines 'national of the United States' as '(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.'
"Robertson-Dewar v. Mukasey, 599 F. Supp. 2d 772". U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. February 25, 2009. hlm.779 n.3. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal August 30, 2021. Diakses tanggal June 8, 2021. The [INA] defines naturalization as 'conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.'
Slotkin, Richard (2001). "Unit Pride: Ethnic Platoons and the Myths of American Nationality". American Literary History. 13 (3). Oxford University Press: 469–498. doi:10.1093/alh/13.3.469. JSTOR3054557. S2CID143996198. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal March 13, 2023. Diakses tanggal March 13, 2023. But it also expresses a myth of American nationality that remains vital in our political and cultural life: the idealized self-image of a multiethnic, multiracial democracy, hospitable to differences but united by a common sense of national belonging.
Eder, Klaus; Giesen, Bernhard (2001). European Citizenship: Between National Legacies and Postnational Projects. Oxford University Press. hlm.25–26. ISBN9780199241200. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal April 7, 2023. Diakses tanggal February 1, 2013. In inter-state relations, the American nation state presents its members as a monistic political body-despite ethnic and national groups in the interior.
Petersen, William; Novak, Michael; Gleason, Philip (1982). Concepts of Ethnicity. Harvard University Press. hlm.62. ISBN9780674157262. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal April 4, 2023. Diakses tanggal February 1, 2013. To be or to become an American, a person did not have to be of any particular national, linguistic, religious, or ethnic background. All he had to do was to commit himself to the political ideology centered on the abstract ideals of liberty, equality, and republicanism. Thus the universalist ideological character of American nationality meant that it was open to anyone who willed to become an American.
↑Petersen, William; Novak, Michael; Gleason, Philip (1982). Concepts of Ethnicity. Harvard University Press. hlm.62. ISBN9780674157262. Diarsipkan dari versi aslinya tanggal April 4, 2023. Diakses tanggal February 1, 2013. ...from Thomas Paine's plea in 1783...to Henry Clay's remark in 1815... "It is hard for us to believe ... how conscious these early Americans were of the job of developing American character out of the regional and generational polaritities and contradictions of a nation of immigrants and migrants." ... To be or to become an American, a person did not have to be of any particular national, linguistic, religious, or ethnic background. All he had to do was to commit himself to the political ideology centered on the abstract ideals of liberty, equality, and republicanism. Thus the universalist ideological character of American nationality meant that it was open to anyone who willed to become an American.
.svg)
