For the parody of nose classification, see Nasology.
Nosology (from Ancient Greekνόσος (nosos)'disease' and -λογία (-logia)'study of') is the branch of medical science that deals with the classification of diseases. Fully classifying a medical condition requires knowing its cause (and that there is only one cause), the effects it has on the body, the symptoms that are produced, and other factors. For example, influenza is classified as an infectious disease because it is caused by a virus, and it is classified as a respiratory infection because the virus infects and damages certain tissues in the respiratory tract. The more that is known about the disease, the more ways the disease can be classified nosologically.
Nosography is a description whose primary purpose is enabling a diagnostic label to be put on the situation.[1][2] As such, a nosographical entity need not have a single cause. For example, inability to speak due to advanced dementia and an inability to speak due to a stroke could be nosologically different but nosographically the same.
Alternatively, diseases may be classified according to the organ system involved, though this is often complicated since many diseases affect more than one organ.
Traditionally diseases were defined as syndromes by their symptoms. When more information is available, they are also defined by the damage they produce. When cause is known, they are better defined by their cause, though still important are their characteristics. This leads to a branching differentiation in which a clinical syndrome (pattern of signs and symptoms) can come to be understood as a nonspecific finding shared by a group of disease entities or endotypes. For example, concepts such as murrain and the grippe that were formerly undifferentiable to humans and thus understood as a single disease later can be logically unraveled as separate diseases with similar clinical presentations. Thus, nosology is dynamic, reclassifying as science advances.[citation needed]
The advent of molecular biology brought a further reclassification potential with the concept of molecularly defined diseases, defined by their molecular characteristics. This concept was introduced in 1949, with the seminal paper, "Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease",[3] in Science magazine, Linus Pauling, Harvey Itano and their collaborators laid the groundwork for establishing the field of molecular medicine. Molecular medicine, in concert with genetics and genomics as aspects of molecular biology, provided new instances of the theme that clinical presentations that humans formerly interpreted as a single disease can be subclassified into a group of disease entities or endotypes. For example, many OMIM database entries show the pattern of disease name XYZ with types identified as XYZ1 (involving sequence variants in gene A), XYZ2 (involving sequence variants in gene B), XYZ3 (involving sequence variants in gene C), XYZ4 (involving sequence variants in both genes B and C), and so on.[citation needed]
Coding systems
Several classifications of diseases have been historically proposed, and normally all of them assign a code to every supported disease. Some of them codify diseases following the path of the classification tree, and others like SNOMED use a multifactor classification system.[citation needed]
There are also coding systems for symptoms present in the diseases and biological findings. They are normally included in medical dictionaries, also with a codification system. Some of them are MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), COSTART (Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms) or MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities)[5] Other systems like Current Procedural Terminology do not deal directly with diseases but with the related procedures.[citation needed]
Medical conditions, like diseases, can be defined by cause, pathogenesis (mechanism by which the disease is caused), or by a collection of symptoms, medical signs and biomarkers, particularly when the other two definitions are not available (idiopathic diseases).
From a nosological point of view, medical conditions can be divided in disorders, diseases, syndromes, lesions and injuries, each one with some specific meaning, as listed at Disease § Terminology.
History
Ancient medical treatises had a variety of different ways of classifying and grouping illnesses. Chinese texts like the Huangdi Neijing categorized diseases by which of the atmospheric influences was believed to be responsible for them.[8] Many ancient Greek, Mesopotamian, Roman, and Egyptian authors categorized diseases by the body parts they affected, while others divided diseases into acute or chronic illnesses.[9] Mental disorders were classified into categories like mania and paranoia by Hippocrates,[10] and this system was utilized by later authors like Najib ad-Din Samarqandi.[11]
Many popular ancient disease classification systems largely relied upon humorism,[9] which carried over into medieval times. Early attempts to develop more comprehensive approaches to the classification of diseases were made by Jean Fernel in the 16th century.[12] Early modern nosological efforts grouped diseases by their symptoms, whereas modern systems focus on grouping diseases by the anatomy and cause involved.
In the 17th century, the English physician Thomas Sydenham was the first to propose a syndrome-based classification of diseases. For Sydenham a disease and a syndrome were equivalent concepts.[13]
↑Stanghellini, Giovanni; Fuchs, Thomas (4 July 2013). One Century of Karl Jaspers' General Psychopathology. OUP Oxford. ISBN978-0-19-150647-5. The aim of nosography is the description of single illnesses to allow their diagnosis. Nosography outlines provisional and conventional characteristics of a syndrome and thereby serves the goal of an empirical diagnosis.
↑Abenhaim, Lucien et al. The Prognostic Consequences in the Making of the Initial Medical Diagnosis of Work-Related Back Injuries. Spine Journal, 1995
↑Leung, Angela Ki Che; Liang, Qizi (2009). Leprosy in China: A History. Columbia University Press. pp.17–22. ISBN9780231123006.
12Amneris Roselli (2018). "Nosology". In Peter E. Pormann (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates. Cambridge University Press. ISBN9781107068209.
↑Murthy, R. Srinivasa; Wig, Narendra N. (22 April 2002). "Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification in Developing Countries". In Mario Maj (ed.). Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification. Wiley. ISBN978-0471496816.
↑Moriyama, Iwao M.; Loy, Ruth M.; Robb-Smith, Alastair H.T. (2011). "Development of the Classification of Diseases"(PDF). History of the Statistical Classification of Diseases and Causes of Death. CDC.
Snider, G. L. (2003). "Nosology for Our Day". American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 167 (5): 678–683. doi:10.1164/rccm.200203-204PP. PMID12598211.