This image does not meet the threshold of originality and the text does not qualify as a literary work, so I believe it should be marked as such 277volts (talk) 20:59, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
I agree. Currently battling with a few bots who all want to reduce the image size because the license is tagged as "non-free". OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:58, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
I agree with this too but apparently at the commons discussion for the deletion of the file at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canvas Hack Screenshot 2026-05-07 18-20-00.png they say that "the message in this screenshot is too complex for Template:PD-text, as the demands have enough creative choice in their expression/phrasing/wording to meet the 'modicum of creativity' required to qualify for copyright protection in the US."
The current resolution of the image doesn't really make sense to me. If the text is copyrighted, the current low-resolution version that keeps the text readable would have the same "impact on the commercial viability of the art" as the high-resolution version. (and if the text isn't copyrightable, there's no reason to use a low resolution version) Not Invisible (talk) 01:52, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
I boldly reverted it to the original version. The bots automatically reduced the resolution. Kibblebrain (talk) 07:11, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}